Literature DB >> 12182690

Smooth blood pressure control obtained with extended-release felodipine in elderly patients with hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Roberto Antonicelli1, Stefano Omboni, Di Ciò Giovanni, Roberto Ansuini, Alfredo Mori, Rosaria Gesuita, Gianfranco Parati, Enrico Paciaroni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess, by smoothness index (SI), distribution of the antihypertensive effect of extended-release (ER) felodipine over 24 hours in elderly patients with hypertension.
METHODS: After a 4-week washout phase, 35 elderly patients (mean age 69 +/- 4 years) with mild-to-moderate hypertension received 2 weeks' treatment with ER felodipine 5mg once daily. The dosage of ER felodipine was doubled to 10 mg/day and given for a further 2 weeks in non-responders (sitting clinic blood pressure > 140/90mm Hg). The study had an open-label design with no placebo control. After each period, clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured. Trough-to-peak (T/P) ratio was computed by dividing the blood pressure (BP) change at trough (22 to 24 hours after drug intake) by the change at peak (2 adjacent hours with a maximal BP reduction between the second and eighth hour after drug intake). SI was calculated as the ratio between the average of the 24, hourly, treatment-induced BP changes and its standard deviation.
RESULTS: After the initial 2-week treatment period, clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BP values were higher in non-responders (145 +/- 11/87 +/- 8 and 135 +/- 17/80 +/- 6mm Hg, respectively) than in responders (133 +/- 6/81 +/- 3 and 130 +/- 9/77 +/- 7mm Hg). In non-responders, clinic and 24-hour BP values were lowered after a further 2 weeks of treatment with ER felodipine 10 mg/day (128 +/- 11/78 +/- 6 and 128 +/- 12/75 +/- 5mm Hg). SI was high in responders (0.8 +/- 0.8/0.7 +/- 0.7 for systolic/diastolic BP) and low in non-responders (0.5 +/- 0.6/0.3 +/- 0.6) during the first 2-week treatment period. It increased in non-responders after an additional 2 weeks of treatment with ER felodipine 10 mg/day (1.0 +/- 0.8/0.7 +/- 0.6). Median T/P ratios were 0.73 and 0.61 (systolic BP and diastolic BP) in responders and 0.41 and 0.61 in non-responders after 2 weeks of treatment. At variance with SI, T/P ratios did not increase in non-responders after doubling the dosage of ER felodipine (0.34 and 0.18). ER felodipine did not increase 24-hour heart rate. A total of nine adverse events were recorded in six patients (17%), but no patients withdrew from the study.
CONCLUSION: ER felodipine 5 to 10 mg/day smoothly and safely reduces 24-hour ambulatory BP in elderly patients with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12182690     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200219070-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  42 in total

1.  Longitudinal association of ambulatory pulse pressure with left ventricular mass and vascular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R S Khattar; D U Acharya; C Kinsey; R Senior; A Lahiri
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the design of antihypertensive drug trials.

Authors:  J Conway; A J Coats
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1991-12

Review 3.  Cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly.

Authors:  E Casiglia; P Palatini
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Antihypertensive efficacy of lercanidipine at 2.5, 5 and 10 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertensives assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Multicenter Study Investigators.

Authors:  S Omboni; A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 5.  The classification of calcium antagonists and their selection in the treatment of hypertension. A reappraisal.

Authors:  T F Lüscher; F Cosentino
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart Disease? The Framingham heart study.

Authors:  S S Franklin; S A Khan; N D Wong; M G Larson; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effect of calcium antagonists on plasma norepinephrine levels, heart rate, and blood pressure.

Authors:  E Grossman; F H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in older patients.

Authors:  D Faulds; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Hypertension in the elderly: age- and disease-related complications and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  E G Lakatta; J D Cohen; J L Fleg; E D Frohlich; A H Gradman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.