Literature DB >> 9559473

Adhesiveness of AcrySof to a collagen film.

T Nagata1, A Minakata, I Watanabe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the adhesiveness of the AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) to a collagen film to ascertain its capacity to adhere to the lens capsule.
SETTING: Haibara General Hospital, Haibara, and Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
METHODS: Each of five AcrySof IOLs was attached to a collagen film, slightly pressed in intraocular irrigating solution, and then pulled up and off the film with a DuNouy's surface balance. The force recorded by the surface balance at the moment it detached from the film was defined as the lens' adhesiveness. A control experiment was performed using five conventional poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOLs.
RESULTS: Mean adhesiveness was 2.76 gram-weight (gw) +/- 0.55 (SD) for AcrySof and 0.81 +/- 0.20 gw for PMMA. The difference was statistically significant (P < .0001, t-test).
CONCLUSION: AcrySof may have a strong tendency to adhere to the lens capsule, contributing to posterior and anterior capsule clarity and preventing lens decentration in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9559473     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80325-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  18 in total

1.  [Influence of intraocular lens material and design on the development of posterior capsule opacification].

Authors:  O Nishi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [New methods for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber; A J Reuland
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Capsular contraction syndrome following insertion of hydrophilic acrylic lens.

Authors:  Archana Malik; Neeti Gupta; Sunandan Sood
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Influence of intraocular lens material and design on postoperative intracapsular cellular reactivity.

Authors:  D J Apple
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2000

5.  Hydrophobic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Yan Li; Lian Wu; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Academy IRIS® Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Horn; Bret L Fisher; Daniel Terveen; Helene Fevrier; Mohinder Merchea; Xiaolin Gu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-01

7.  Hydrophobic acrylic versus heparin surface-modified polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens: a biocompatibility study.

Authors:  Daniele Tognetto; Lisa Toto; Daniela Minutola; Enzo Ballone; Marta Di Nicola; Rocco Di Mascio; Giuseppe Ravalico
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Effect of haptic material and number of intraocular lens on anterior capsule contraction after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sun Young Kim; Ji Wook Yang; Young Chun Lee; Su-Young Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-15

9.  Comparison of posterior capsular opacification in heparin-surface-modified hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Seungbum Kang; Jin A Choi; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Delayed accumulation of lens material behind the foldable intraocular lens.

Authors:  Harsha Bhattacharjee; Kasturi Bhattacharjee; Pankaj Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.