Literature DB >> 9554896

Resolution of peanut allergy: case-control study.

J O Hourihane1, S A Roberts, J O Warner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there are any differences between children who remain mildly or moderately allergic to peanut and children with similar histories but a negative reaction on challenge with peanut.
DESIGN: Case-controls matched for age and sex.
SETTING: Children's day wards in two teaching hospitals. INTERVENTION: Open food challenge with peanut.
SUBJECTS: 15 children with resolved peanut allergy (resolvers) and 15 with persistent allergy (persisters). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reaction on challenge with peanut, serum total and peanut specific IgE concentrations.
RESULTS: The groups had a similar median age at first reaction to peanut (11 months, range 5-38) and similar symptoms. Allergy to other foods was less common in resolvers (2/15) than persisters (9/15) (P=0.02). On skin prick testing with peanut all 13 resolvers tested but only 3/14 persisters had a weal of <6 mm (P<0.0001). Total and peanut specific IgE concentrations did not differ much between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Appropriately trained clinicians must be prepared to challenge preschool children with peanut as some will be tolerant despite a history of reactions to peanut and a positive skin prick test with peanut. Preschool children whose apparent peanut allergy is refuted by food challenge show allergy to other foods less often than those in whom peanut allergy persists. The size of weal on skin prick testing to peanut predicts reactivity but not severity on peanut challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554896      PMCID: PMC28527          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  14 in total

1.  Allergenic properties of ovomucoid in man.

Authors:  S K Cooke; H A Sampson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Clinical characteristics of peanut allergy.

Authors:  J O Hourihane; S A Kilburn; P Dean; J O Warner
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.018

3.  Allergy to peanut, nuts, and sesame seed in Australian children.

Authors:  R Sporik; D Hill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-07

4.  The natural history of peanut allergy.

Authors:  S A Bock; F M Atkins
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) as an office procedure: a manual.

Authors:  S A Bock; H A Sampson; F M Atkins; R S Zeiger; S Lehrer; M Sachs; R K Bush; D D Metcalfe
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  A follow-up study of children with food allergy. Clinical course in relation to serum IgE- and IgG-antibody levels to milk, egg and fish.

Authors:  A Dannaeus; M Inganäs
Journal:  Clin Allergy       Date:  1981-11

7.  Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years.

Authors:  S M Tariq; M Stevens; S Matthews; S Ridout; R Twiselton; D W Hide
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-31

8.  Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents.

Authors:  H A Sampson; D G Ho
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Food hypersensitivity and atopic dermatitis: evaluation of 113 patients.

Authors:  H A Sampson; C C McCaskill
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Peanut allergy in relation to heredity, maternal diet, and other atopic diseases: results of a questionnaire survey, skin prick testing, and food challenges.

Authors:  J O Hourihane; T P Dean; J O Warner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-31
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Challenging times for food allergy tests.

Authors:  S Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization.

Authors:  Edwin H Kim; J Andrew Bird; Michael Kulis; Susan Laubach; Laurent Pons; Wayne Shreffler; Pamela Steele; Janet Kamilaris; Brian Vickery; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Enteric reovirus infection stimulates peanut-specific IgG2a responses in a mouse food allergy model.

Authors:  Ronald J Fecek; Marisa Marcondes Rezende; Ryan Busch; Ine Hassing; Raymond Pieters; Christopher F Cuff
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.144

4.  Resolution of peanut allergy. Patients have not been proved to grow out of peanut allergy.

Authors:  T David
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-07

5.  Developing the BMJ's coverage of basic science. We are introducing science commentaries

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-25

Review 6.  Food allergy overview in children.

Authors:  Sujatha Ramesh
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  Clinical spectrum of food allergies: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Marco H-K Ho; Wilfred H-S Wong; Christopher Chang
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 8.  Clinical Immunology Review Series: An approach to the patient with allergy in childhood.

Authors:  R Sporik; J Henderson; J O'B Hourihane
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Recent advances in immunotherapy and vaccine development for peanut allergy.

Authors:  Katherine Anagnostou
Journal:  Ther Adv Vaccines       Date:  2015-05

Review 10.  How a non-allergist survives an allergy clinic.

Authors:  M Rosenthal
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.