Literature DB >> 9554621

Comparison of short-term functional outcomes following unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction surgery.

R M Kotloff1, G Tino, H I Palevsky, J Hansen-Flaschen, P M Wahl, L R Kaiser, J E Bavaria.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To compare short-term functional outcomes following unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) performed in patients with advanced emphysema.
METHODS: LVRS was performed unilaterally in 32 patients and bilaterally in 119 patients. Pulmonary function testing and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were performed preoperatively and repeated at 3 to 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Bilateral LVRS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (10% vs 0%, p<0.05) and a higher incidence of postoperative respiratory failure (12.6% vs 0%; p<0.05) compared with unilateral LVRS. There was no significant difference in duration of air leaks between unilateral and bilateral groups, but the mean hospital stay was significantly longer following bilateral LVRS (21.1+/-32.0 days vs 14.2+/-14.0 days; p<0.05). Preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the unilateral and bilateral groups with respect to FEV1, FVC, residual volume, or 6MWT distance. However, for all of these parameters, the magnitude of improvement was significantly greater following bilateral LVRS. Notably, the magnitude of improvement in each parameter following unilateral LVRS exceeded half that following bilateral LVRS, suggesting that functional outcomes after the unilateral procedure were disproportionate to the amount of tissue resected. Serial functional assessment of seven patients undergoing staged unilateral procedures (two unilateral procedures separated in time by at least 3 months) demonstrated somewhat unpredictable responses; failure to achieve a favorable response to the initial procedure did not necessarily portend a similar outcome with the contralateral side, and vise versa.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral LVRS produces a greater magnitude of short-term functional improvement than does the unilateral procedure and should be considered the procedure of choice for most patients. Unilateral LVRS should be reserved for patients in whom factors contraindicating entrance into one hemithorax exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554621     DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.4.890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and the six-minute walk test results in sarcoidosis patients.

Authors:  Arda Kiani; Alireza Eslaminejad; Mohsen Shafeipour; Fatemeh Razavi; Seyyed Reza Seyyedi; Babak Sharif-Kashani; Habib Emami; Mehrdad Bakhshayesh-Karam; Atefeh Abedini
Journal:  Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 0.670

Review 2.  The complex care of severe emphysema: role of awake lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Eugenio Pompeo; Paola Rogliani; Leonardo Palombi; Augusto Orlandi; Benedetto Cristino; Mario Dauri
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

Review 3.  Staged unilateral lung volume reduction surgery: from mini-invasive to minimalist treatment strategies.

Authors:  Eugenio Pompeo; Paola Rogliani; Benedetto Cristino; Eleonora Fabbi; Mario Dauri; Gianluigi Sergiacomi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Lung volume reduction surgery since the National Emphysema Treatment Trial: study of Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

Authors:  Marquita R Decker; Glen E Leverson; Wassim Abi Jaoude; James D Maloney
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in severe emphysema.

Authors:  Edward P Ingenito; Douglas E Wood; James P Utz
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.