Literature DB >> 30210829

Staged unilateral lung volume reduction surgery: from mini-invasive to minimalist treatment strategies.

Eugenio Pompeo1, Paola Rogliani2, Benedetto Cristino1, Eleonora Fabbi3, Mario Dauri3, Gianluigi Sergiacomi4.   

Abstract

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) entailing unilateral or bilateral non-anatomical resection of severely damaged emphysematous tissue carried out by thoracoscopic or open surgical approaches, under general anesthesia with single-lung ventilation, has resulted in significant and long-lasting clinical and functional benefit. Unfortunately, the morbidity rates reported by simultaneous bilateral resectional LVRS has led to raise criticism regarding its cost-effectiveness and has stimulated in recent years the development of less invasive bronchoscopic and surgical non-resectional methods of treatment that are preferentially performed in a staged unilateral fashion. We had previously proposed an innovative LVRS modality, which did not entail any resection of lung tissue and was electively carried out according to a staged unilateral strategy by a multiport thoracoscopic access, through thoracic epidural anesthesia in conscious, spontaneously ventilating patients (awake LVRS). The awake LVRS resulted in significant clinical benefit paralleling that achieved by the resectional method with lower morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay. Moreover, the awake LVRS proved also suitable to be employed in stringently selected patients to perform redo procedures following previous successful bilateral LVRS. More recently, in order to minimize the global surgery- and anesthesia-related traumas, we have modified our original non-resectional method by adopting a single thoracoscopic access as well as an anesthesia protocol entailing use of a simple intercostal block with target control sedation, to realize an ultra-minimally invasive or minimalist LVRS. Hence, a deeper investigation of the pros and cons of staged unilateral LVRS strategies as well as of the novel surgical non-resectional and redo LVRS is warranted in order to verify, the optimal strategies of treatment, which will prove to reduce the typical LVRS-related morbidity while assuring the most durable benefit in patients with advanced emphysema.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); emphysema; nonintubated anesthesia; thoracoscopy; video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30210829      PMCID: PMC6129814          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  40 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of staged versus one-stage bilateral thoracoscopic reduction pneumoplasty.

Authors:  Eugenio Pompeo; Tommaso Claudio Mineo
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Long-term outcome of bilateral lung volume reduction in 250 consecutive patients with emphysema.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ciccone; Bryan F Meyers; Tracey J Guthrie; Gail E Davis; Roger D Yusen; Stephen S Lefrak; G Alexander Patterson; Joel D Cooper
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation therapy in the management of heterogeneous emphysema.

Authors:  Gregory Snell; Felix J F Herth; Peter Hopkins; Kimberley M Baker; Christian Witt; Mark H Gotfried; Arschang Valipour; Manfred Wagner; Franz Stanzel; Jim J Egan; Steven Kesten; Armin Ernst
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery.

Authors:  Eugenio Pompeo; Paola Rogliani; Federico Tacconi; Mario Dauri; Cesare Saltini; Giuseppe Novelli; Tommaso C Mineo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Lung volume reduction surgery--a comparison of the long term outcome of unilateral vs. bilateral approaches.

Authors:  I F Oey; D A Waller; S Bal; S J Singh; T J Spyt; M D L Morgan
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Lung volume reduction reoperations.

Authors:  Federico Tacconi; Eugenio Pompeo; Daniele Forcella; Mario Marino; Dimitrios Varvaras; Tommaso C Mineo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Comparison of staged thoracoscopy and median sternotomy for lung volume reduction.

Authors:  S R Hazelrigg; T M Boley; M J Magee; C H Lawyer; J Q Henkle
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Relation between preoperative inspiratory lung resistance and the outcome of lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.

Authors:  E P Ingenito; R B Evans; S H Loring; D W Kaczka; J D Rodenhouse; S C Body; D J Sugarbaker; S J Mentzer; M M DeCamp; J J Reilly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of clinical results for unilateral and bilateral thoracoscopic lung volume reduction.

Authors:  G A Lowdermilk; R J Keenan; R J Landreneau; S R Hazelrigg; J E Bavaria; L R Kaiser; C A Keller; K S Naunheim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Repeated lung volume reduction surgery is successful in selected patients.

Authors:  Arthur Kostron; Michaela Horn-Tutic; Daniel Franzen; Peter Kestenholz; Didier Schneiter; Isabelle Opitz; Malcolm Kohler; Walter Weder
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.