Literature DB >> 9554016

Long-term suprapubic catheterisation: clinical outcome and satisfaction survey.

M K Sheriff1, S Foley, J McFarlane, R Nauth-Misir, M Craggs, P J Shah.   

Abstract

We report on the clinical outcome and satisfaction survey of long-term suprapubic catheterisation in patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction. Between early 1988 and later 1995, 185 suprapubic catheters were inserted under direct cystoscopic vision. Anti-cholinergic therapy was given to all patients with significant detrusor hyper-reflexia; the catheters clamped daily for two hours and changed every six weeks. Ultrasonography and assessment of the serum creatinine were used to assess the upper renal tracts, and the results of the pre- and post-catheter video-cystometrography was used to evaluate bladder morphology, cystometric capacity, maximum detrusor pressure and the presence of vesico-ureteric reflux. There were equivalent numbers of males and females. The follow-up ranges from 3-68 months. Following catheterisation, there was a 50% reduction in the average maximum detrusor pressure, bladder morphology improved in 85% of the cases; the bladder capacity and upper renal tracts remained unchanged. Vesico-ureteric reflux was abolished in 33% of the cases. Complaints were common consisting of recurrent catheter blockage, persistent urinary leakage and recurrent urinary tract infections. There was a 2.7% incidence of small bowel injury with one fatality. However, the general level of satisfaction was high. It is concluded that suprapubic catheterisation is an effective and well tolerated method of management in selected patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction for whom only major surgery would otherwise provide a solution to incontinence. We are encouraged to find preservation of renal function with maintained bladder volumes and reduced maximum detrusor pressures thus justifying the policy of catheter clamping and anti-cholinergic therapy in the presence of significant detrusor hyper-reflexia. However, even in expert hands this procedure is not without hazards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554016     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  23 in total

1.  Plausible mechanism of small bowel injury during trocar cystostomy.

Authors:  Sudhanshu Chitale; Stuart Irving
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-03-11

2.  To clamp or not to clamp? Bladder management by suprapubic catheterization in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

Authors:  Jürgen Pannek; Konrad Göcking; Ulf Bersch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Rethinking suprapubic cystostomy in voiding dysfunction: new trial with timed drainage.

Authors:  Hyeung Chul Park; Jeong Hwan Son; Seok Heun Jang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-12-21

4.  An adverse event of suprapubic catheter SPC insertion. A call for updating the existing guidelines.

Authors:  Rozh Jalil; Chandrika Mukundan; Tahir S Bhatti
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-15

5.  A peculiar complication of suprapubic catheterization: recurrent ureteral obstruction and hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Bamidele Adeyemo; Steven Makovitch; Dominic Foo
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 6.  A practical approach to difficult urinary catheterizations.

Authors:  Cameron Ghaffary; Amanuel Yohannes; Carlos Villanueva; Stephen W Leslie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage following reconstructive pelvic surgery: a comparison of patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Authors:  Michelle M Takase-Sanchez; Jennifer C Thompson; Douglass S Hale; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The effect of appropriate bladder management on urinary tract infection rate in patients with a new spinal cord injury: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Derek B Hennessey; N Kinnear; L MacLellan; C E Byrne; J Gani; A K Nunn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Small bowel injury after suprapubic catheter insertion presenting 3 years after initial insertion.

Authors:  Kevin M Gallagher; Daniel W Good; John P Brush; Ammar Alhasso; Ammar Al-hasso; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-10

10.  The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae.

Authors:  R S Ahluwalia; N Johal; C Kouriefs; G Kooiman; Bruce S I Montgomery; R O Plail
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.