Literature DB >> 24326435

Small bowel injury after suprapubic catheter insertion presenting 3 years after initial insertion.

Kevin M Gallagher1, Daniel W Good, John P Brush, Ammar Alhasso, Ammar Al-hasso, Grant D Stewart.   

Abstract

A 77-year-old woman was referred to urology with blockages of her suprapubic catheter (SPC). The catheter was replaced easily in the emergency department, however, no urine was draining, only a cloudy green fluid was visible. On cystoscopy bilious material was identified in the bladder. There was no catheter visible. There seemed to be a fistulous tract entering the bladder at the left dome. The urethra was dilated, a urethral catheter was placed and the SPC was removed. A CT demonstrated that the SPC tract transfixed a loop of pelvic small bowel and entered the bladder with no intraperitoneal contrast leak. The patient recovered well and did not require laparotomy. This case emphasises that bowel perforation, although rare, must be considered as a complication of SPC placement even years after initial insertion when catheter problems arise. Unusually, we learn that this complication may not present with abdominal pain or peritonism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24326435      PMCID: PMC3863078          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-201436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Suprapubic catheter insertion using an ultrasound-guided technique and literature review.

Authors:  Preman Jacob; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Alistair W Todd
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  British Association of Urological Surgeons' suprapubic catheter practice guidelines.

Authors:  Simon C W Harrison; William T Lawrence; Roland Morley; Ian Pearce; Joby Taylor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Small bowel perforation during suprapubic tube exchange.

Authors:  Anne K Mongiu; Brain T Helfand; Stephanie J Kielb
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  A rare cause of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Etienne Cassar Delia; Rodney Hallan
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.825

5.  Long-term suprapubic catheterisation: clinical outcome and satisfaction survey.

Authors:  M K Sheriff; S Foley; J McFarlane; R Nauth-Misir; M Craggs; P J Shah
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Occult transfixation of the sigmoid colon by suprapubic catheter.

Authors:  Miles D Witham; Andrew D Martindale
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae.

Authors:  R S Ahluwalia; N Johal; C Kouriefs; G Kooiman; Bruce S I Montgomery; R O Plail
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Delayed bowel perforation following suprapubic catheter insertion.

Authors:  Shwan J Ahmed; Ajay Mehta; Peter Rimington
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 2.264

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Bowel perforation presenting three months after suprapubic catheter insertion.

Authors:  Thomas Stonier; Nick Simson; Elizabeth Wilson; Konstantinos Eleftherios Stergios
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-07

2.  Using central venous catheter for suprapubic catheterization in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Eissa Bilehjani; Solmaz Fakhari
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2017-01-04

3.  Small Bowel Obstruction Due to Suprapubic Catheter Placement.

Authors:  Patrick C Bonasso; Brandon Lucke-Wold; Uzer Khan
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2016-05-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.