Literature DB >> 9553535

Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

C N Cornell1, D Levine, J O'Doherty, J Lyden.   

Abstract

This paper presents the short term results of an ongoing prospective randomized trial comparing a cemented unipolar with a cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Forty-seven patients with an average age of 77 years completed 6-month followup. Outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months were assessed by completion of a patient oriented hip outcome instrument and by functional tests of walking speed and endurance. No differences in the postoperative complication rates or lengths of hospitalization were seen between the two groups. Patients treated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty had greater range of hip motion in rotation and abduction and had faster walking speeds. However, no differences in hip rating outcomes were found. These early results suggest that use of the less expensive unipolar prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture may be justified in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9553535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

Review 1.  Extracts from "clinical evidence": hip fracture.

Authors:  W J Gillespie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christian Inngul; Carl-Johan Hedbeck; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunilla Lapidus; Sari Ponzer; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Carl Johan Hedbeck; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunilla Lapidus; Hans Törnkvist; Sari Ponzer; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Anders Enocson; Carl Johan Hedbeck; Hans Törnkvist; Jan Tidermark; Lasse J Lapidus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Bipolar versus monopolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femur neck fractures: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Migliorini Filippo; Arne Driessen; Giorgia Colarossi; Valentin Quack; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-26

6.  Revision of failed hip hemiarthroplasty. Classification, management, and follow-up.

Authors:  Elsayed Morsi; Mohamed Elsawy Habib; Adel Elseedy; Taher Eid
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-22

7.  Predictors of gait speed in patients after hip fracture.

Authors:  Kathleen Kline Mangione; Rebecca L Craik; Rosalie Lopopolo; James D Tomlinson; Susan K Brenneman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing unipolar with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fractures.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xueqiang Tao; Pei Wang; Zheng Zhang; Wenlong Zhang; Quan Qi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years of age - which is the ideal modality of primary joint replacement?

Authors:  Christian Ossendorf; Max J Scheyerer; Guido A Wanner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Clément Ml Werner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-10-20

Review 10.  Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties.

Authors:  James Varley; Martyn J Parker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.