Literature DB >> 15316673

Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties.

James Varley1, Martyn J Parker.   

Abstract

It has been stated in the literature that a bipolar hemiarthroplasty has a lower risk of dislocation compared to a unipolar hemiarthroplasty. As this statement has not been substantiated we undertook a systematic review of the literature of published articles from the last 40 years. In addition we used our own database of hip fractures. One hundred and thirty-three published articles were included in the review to give a total of 23,107 cases. The overall dislocation rate for all types of hemiarthroplasty was 791/23,107 (3.4%). An increased risk of dislocation was associated with a posterior surgical approach and the use of a cemented prosthesis. After adjustment for surgical approach and the use of cement there was no difference in risk of dislocation between unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties. There was an increased risk of open reduction for a bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316673      PMCID: PMC3456984          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0572-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  R Iorio; W L Healy; D W Lemos; D Appleby; C A Lucchesi; K J Saleh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  An analysis of dislocation of the cemented femoral hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  R D D'Ambrosia; R G Chuinard; D M D'Amico; H F Shortley; J C Becker
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-10

3.  Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  C N Cornell; D Levine; J O'Doherty; J Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults.

Authors:  M J Parker; D Rajan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

5.  Hemiarthroplasty of the hip--the anterior or posterior approach? A comparison of surgical approaches.

Authors:  G S Keene; M J Parker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Thompson prosthesis for fractured neck of femur. A comparison of surgical approaches.

Authors:  R N Chan; J Hoskinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-11

7.  Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years.

Authors:  J N Davison; S J Calder; G H Anderson; G Ward; C Jagger; W M Harper; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

8.  Femoral head replacement following fracture: an analysis of the surgical approach.

Authors:  M R Wood
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  R Malhotra; R Arya; S Bhan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective study.

Authors:  S J Calder; G H Anderson; C Jagger; W M Harper; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-05
View more
  30 in total

1.  Dislocation of hip hemiarthroplasty following posterolateral surgical approach: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Mikko T Ovaska; Martti Soiva; Tero Vahlberg; Jussi Haapala
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers from the national registries.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; Ramprasad Kancherla; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Aditya Soral; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Kévin Brulefert; Antoine Chalopin; Pierre Marie Longis; François Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is the dislocation rate higher after bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with neuromuscular diseases?

Authors:  Kuen Tak Suh; Dae Woong Kim; Hong Seok Lee; Yoon Jae Seong; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Carl Johan Hedbeck; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunilla Lapidus; Hans Törnkvist; Sari Ponzer; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Anders Enocson; Carl Johan Hedbeck; Hans Törnkvist; Jan Tidermark; Lasse J Lapidus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Dislocation and dissociation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Moriarity; Prasad Ellanti; Samir Talha; John McKenna
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Predictors and outcomes of treatment in hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation.

Authors:  K M I Salem; O A Shannak; B E Scammell; C G Moran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  What Are the Risk Factors for Dislocation of Hip Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Through the Anterolateral Approach? A Nested Case-control Study.

Authors:  Lianhua Li; Jixin Ren; Jia Liu; Hao Wang; Qinghua Sang; Zhi Liu; Tiansheng Sun
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Quality of life after dislocation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 319 patients with femoral neck fractures with a one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Anders Enocson; Hans Pettersson; Sari Ponzer; Hans Törnkvist; Nils Dalén; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.