Literature DB >> 9552067

Single-dose oral granisetron has equivalent antiemetic efficacy to intravenous ondansetron for highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

R J Gralla1, R M Navari, P J Hesketh, W Popovic, J Strupp, J Noy, L Einhorn, D Ettinger, W Bushnell, C Friedman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the antiemetic efficacy of a single dose of an oral antiemetic (granisetron 2 mg) with a single dose of an intravenous (i.v.) antiemetic (ondansetron 32 mg) given before cisplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients (N = 1,054) scheduled to receive cisplatin (> or = 60 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive either 2 mg of oral granisetron tablets 1 hour before chemotherapy (n = 534) or i.v. ondansetron (32 mg) 30 minutes before chemotherapy (n = 520). The primary efficacy end point was total control (no emesis, no nausea, and no use of antiemetic rescue medication) over the initial 24 hours after the start of chemotherapy. Dexamethasone or methylprednisolone were permitted, but not required, as concomitant prophylactic antiemetics.
RESULTS: Total control was equivalent 24 hours after cisplatin chemotherapy for single-dose oral granisetron (54.7%) and i.v. ondansetron (58.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.6 to 2.4). Similar proportions of patients remained nausea-free in the granisetron group (55.4%) and the ondansetron group (59%) (95% CI, -9.6 to 2.4). The rate of complete control of emesis was 61.2% in the granisetron group and 67.1% in the ondansetron group (95% CI, -11.7 to -0.1). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated, with similar patterns of adverse reactions, generally of a mild degree. The most common side effects included constipation (14%), headache (15%), and diarrhea (10%).
CONCLUSION: Oral granisetron, administered as a single 2-mg dose, provided equivalent total antiemetic control when compared with i.v. ondansetron (32 mg) in patients who received highly emetogenic, cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9552067     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant does not alter the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gerlinde Egerer; Kathrin Eisenlohr; Martina Gronkowski; Juergen Burhenne; Klaus-Dieter Riedel; Gerd Mikus
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Low-dose granisetron for prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a pilot study.

Authors:  Janise Moreno; Marina Sahade; Auro del Giglio
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Anti-emetics for cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis: Potential of alternative delivery systems.

Authors:  L Kraut; A A Fauser
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa Piechotta; Anne Adams; Madhuri Haque; Benjamin Scheckel; Nina Kreuzberger; Ina Monsef; Karin Jordan; Kathrin Kuhr; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-16

Review 6.  The Impact of 5-HT3RA Use on Cost and Utilization in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michael S Broder; Claudio Faria; Annette Powers; Jehangeer Sunderji; Dasha Cherepanov
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05

7.  A phase II, randomized study of aprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapies in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kuniaki Aridome; Shin-Ichirou Mori; Kenji Baba; Masayuki Yanagi; Masahiro Hamanoue; Futoshi Miyazono; Kouki Tokuda; Hiroshi Imamura; Yoshito Ogura; Kouichi Kaneko; Fumio Kijima; Kousei Maemura; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  A retrospective study of R-CHOP/CHOP therapy-induced nausea and vomiting in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a comparison of intravenous and oral 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Tsutomu Takahashi; Satoshi Kumanomidou; Saki Takami; Takahiro Okada; Koji Adachi; Yumi Jo; Fumiyoshi Ikejiri; Chie Onishi; Koshi Kawakami; Takaaki Miyake; Masaya Inoue; Ichiro Moriyama; Ritsuro Suzuki; Junji Suzumiya
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of four 5-HT3-receptor antagonists for acute chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  K Jordan; A Hinke; A Grothey; W Voigt; D Arnold; H-H Wolf; H-J Schmoll
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 10.  Differences in efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical treatments between men and women: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Andrea Chapman; Michaela Strobelberger; Kylie Thaler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.