AIMS: The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan used as conditioning therapy before blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. METHODS: Aprepitant (125 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before melphalan therapy (1 h infusion of 100 mg m⁻²). Eleven plasma samples were obtained over 8 h and melphalan was quantified using an LC/MS/MS method. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and nonparametric testing was applied to assess the differences between aprepitant and placebo treatment. RESULTS: Twenty patients received placebo and 10 patients aprepitant treatment. There were no differences observed for C(max) at the end of melphalan infusion (placebo 3431 ± 608 ngml⁻¹ vs. aprepitant 3269 ± 660 ng ml⁻¹). In addition, AUC and terminal elimination half-life were not changed by aprepitant. Total clearance of melphalan was 304 ± 58 ml min⁻¹ m⁻² (placebo) which was not influenced by aprepitant (288 ± 78 ml min⁻¹ m⁻²). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant 1 h before a high-dose chemotherapy does not influence the exposure and the elimination of melphalan. Therefore, oral administration of 125 mg aprepitant 1 h before melphalan infusion does not alter the disposition of intravenously administered melphalan.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan used as conditioning therapy before blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. METHODS: Aprepitant (125 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before melphalan therapy (1 h infusion of 100 mg m⁻²). Eleven plasma samples were obtained over 8 h and melphalan was quantified using an LC/MS/MS method. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and nonparametric testing was applied to assess the differences between aprepitant and placebo treatment. RESULTS: Twenty patients received placebo and 10 patients aprepitant treatment. There were no differences observed for C(max) at the end of melphalan infusion (placebo 3431 ± 608 ng ml⁻¹ vs. aprepitant 3269 ± 660 ng ml⁻¹). In addition, AUC and terminal elimination half-life were not changed by aprepitant. Total clearance of melphalan was 304 ± 58 ml min⁻¹ m⁻² (placebo) which was not influenced by aprepitant (288 ± 78 ml min⁻¹ m⁻²). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant 1 h before a high-dose chemotherapy does not influence the exposure and the elimination of melphalan. Therefore, oral administration of 125 mg aprepitant 1 h before melphalan infusion does not alter the disposition of intravenously administered melphalan.
Authors: Jacqueline B McCrea; Anup K Majumdar; Michael R Goldberg; Marian Iwamoto; Cynthia Gargano; Deborah L Panebianco; Michael Hesney; Christopher R Lines; Kevin J Petty; Paul J Deutsch; M Gail Murphy; Keith M Gottesdiener; D Ronald Goldwater; Robert A Blum Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Martin Feuring; Yih Lee; Laura H Orlowski; Nicole Michiels; Marina De Smet; Anup K Majumdar; Kevin J Petty; Michael R Goldberg; M Gail Murphy; Keith M Gottesdiener; Michael Hesney; L Ellen Brackett; Martin Wehling Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: H Goldschmidt; P Sonneveld; F W Cremer; B van der Holt; P Westveer; I Breitkreutz; A Benner; A Glasmacher; I G D Schmidt-Wolf; H Martin; D Hoelzer; A D Ho; H M Lokhorst Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2003-07-04 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: R de Wit; J Herrstedt; B Rapoport; A D Carides; G Carides; M Elmer; C Schmidt; J K Evans; K J Horgan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul J Hesketh; Steven M Grunberg; Richard J Gralla; David G Warr; Fausto Roila; Ronald de Wit; Sant P Chawla; Alexandra D Carides; Juliana Ianus; Mary E Elmer; Judith K Evans; Klaus Beck; Scott Reines; Kevin J Horgan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Reinhard Ding; Yorki Tayrouz; Klaus-Dieter Riedel; Jürgen Burhenne; Johanna Weiss; Gerd Mikus; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Rosa I Sanchez; Regina W Wang; Deborah J Newton; Ray Bakhtiar; Ping Lu; Shuet-Hing Lee Chiu; David C Evans; Su-Er W Huskey Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2004-08-10 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Lawrence H Einhorn; Bernardo Rapoport; Rudolph M Navari; Jørn Herrstedt; Mary J Brames Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Thomas Bechtel; Ali McBride; Brooke Crawford; Susan Bullington; Craig C Hofmeister; Don M Benson; Samantha Jaglowski; Sam Penza; Leslie A Andritsos; Steven M Devine Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kinan Alhallak; Amanda Jeske; Pilar de la Puente; Jennifer Sun; Mark Fiala; Feda Azab; Barbara Muz; Ilyas Sahin; Ravi Vij; John F DiPersio; Abdel Kareem Azab Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 4.379