OBJECTIVE: To test the clinical equivalence and resource consequences of day care with inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Randomised controlled clinical trial with integrated cost minimisation economic evaluation. SETTING:Rheumatic diseases unit at a teaching hospital between 1994 and 1996. SUBJECTS:118 consecutive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis randomised to receive either day care or inpatient care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical assessments recorded on admission, discharge, and follow up at 12 months comprised: the health assessment questionnaire, Ritchie articular index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and Steinbrocker functional class. Resource estimates were of the direct and indirect costs relating to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary outcome measures (health utility) were ascertained by time trade off and with the quality of well being scale. RESULTS: Both groups had improvement in scores on the health assessment questionnaire and Ritchie index and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after hospital treatment (P < 0.0001) but clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the groups either at discharge or follow up. The mean hospital cost per patient for day care, 798 Pounds (95% confidence interval 705 Pounds to 888 Pounds), was lower than for inpatient care, 1253 Pounds (1155 Pounds to 1370 Pounds), but this difference was offset by higher community, travel, and readmission costs. The difference in total cost per patient between day care and inpatient care was small (1789 Pounds (1539 Pounds to 2027 Pounds) v 2021 Pounds (1834 Pounds to 2230 Pounds)). Quantile regression analysis showed a cost difference in favour of day care up to the 50th centile (374 Pounds; 639 Pounds to 109 Pounds). CONCLUSIONS: Day care and inpatient care for patients with uncomplicated active rheumatoid arthritis have equivalent clinical outcome with a small difference in overall resource cost in favour of day care. The choice of management strategy may depend increasingly on convenience, satisfaction, or more comprehensive health measures reflecting the preferences of patients, providers, and service commissioners.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test the clinical equivalence and resource consequences of day care with inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Randomised controlled clinical trial with integrated cost minimisation economic evaluation. SETTING:Rheumatic diseases unit at a teaching hospital between 1994 and 1996. SUBJECTS: 118 consecutive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis randomised to receive either day care or inpatient care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical assessments recorded on admission, discharge, and follow up at 12 months comprised: the health assessment questionnaire, Ritchie articular index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and Steinbrocker functional class. Resource estimates were of the direct and indirect costs relating to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary outcome measures (health utility) were ascertained by time trade off and with the quality of well being scale. RESULTS: Both groups had improvement in scores on the health assessment questionnaire and Ritchie index and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after hospital treatment (P < 0.0001) but clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the groups either at discharge or follow up. The mean hospital cost per patient for day care, 798 Pounds (95% confidence interval 705 Pounds to 888 Pounds), was lower than for inpatient care, 1253 Pounds (1155 Pounds to 1370 Pounds), but this difference was offset by higher community, travel, and readmission costs. The difference in total cost per patient between day care and inpatient care was small (1789 Pounds (1539 Pounds to 2027 Pounds) v 2021 Pounds (1834 Pounds to 2230 Pounds)). Quantile regression analysis showed a cost difference in favour of day care up to the 50th centile (374 Pounds; 639 Pounds to 109 Pounds). CONCLUSIONS: Day care and inpatient care for patients with uncomplicated active rheumatoid arthritis have equivalent clinical outcome with a small difference in overall resource cost in favour of day care. The choice of management strategy may depend increasingly on convenience, satisfaction, or more comprehensive health measures reflecting the preferences of patients, providers, and service commissioners.
Authors: V Mor; M Z Stalker; R Gralla; H I Scher; C Cimma; D Park; A M Flaherty; M Kiss; P Nelson; L Laliberte Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: G J Tijhuis; S J Jansen; A M Stiggelbout; A H Zwinderman; J M Hazes; T P Vliet Vlieland Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M Schneider; M Lelgemann; C Baerwald; J Braun; M Hammer; P Kern; A Krause; R Alten; U Faubel; M Hammer; J Lakomek; W Liman; Th Pauly; A Schnabel Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Mwidimi Ndosi; Martyn Lewis; Claire Hale; Helen Quinn; Sarah Ryan; Paul Emery; Howard Bird; Jackie Hill Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 5.837