Literature DB >> 9549534

Dalteparin for deep venous thrombosis: a hospital-in-the-home program.

S B Ting1, R W Ziegenbein, T E Gan, J V Catalano, P Monagle, J Silvers, F E Chambers, S Ng, B P McGrath.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety and cost savings of home treatment of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
SETTING: A hospital-in-the-home treatment program. PATIENTS: One hundred patients with acute lower limb DVT (53 proximal, 47 distal), and no contraindication to home treatment, were entered into the program from March 1995 to February 1997. INTERVENTION: All patients received dalteparin, 200 units/kg subcutaneously, once daily for a minimum of five days, with commencement of oral anticoagulation (warfarin) on Day 2. Patients with proximal DVT had lung ventilation-perfusion scans performed and were admitted to hospital for at least 24 hours. Patients with distal DVT were discharged directly to home treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical responses and the results of sequential duplex ultrasonography at one week, one month, three months and six months.
RESULTS: There were no major, but six minor, bleeding complications, two of which led to dalteparin being withdrawn. Sixteen patients had lung ventilation-perfusion scans showing a high probability of pulmonary embolism. All were asymptomatic, and follow-up for at least three months showed no symptomatic thromboembolic events. Duplex ultrasonography showed progression of thrombosis in the first week of therapy in 13.2% of distal and 2.7% of proximal thromboses. Thereafter, distal DVT improved at a much greater rate than proximal DVT; after six months complete resolution was seen in 60.7% of distal and 18.5% of proximal thromboses, respectively. Cost saving was $197 per bed-day equivalent compared with inpatient care. At 15 months' follow-up, swelling and/or pain was reported by 49% of patients with distal DVT and 66% of those with proximal DVT.
CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily dalteparin therapy for DVT in a hospital-in-the-home setting was safe, efficacious and cost effective. However, DVT resolution is a slow process, with significant long term morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9549534     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140160.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

Review 1.  Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Richard Othieno; Emmanuel Okpo; Rachel Forster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-09

2.  Acceptability of early discharge, hospital at home schemes. Treatments that can be safely and acceptably managed at home need to be defined.

Authors:  M Montalto; M L Grayson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-12

Review 3.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Dalteparin: an update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  C J Dunn; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Community-based treatment of venous thromboembolism with a low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin.

Authors:  Thomas M Hyers; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Treatment of deep vein thrombosis: what factors determine appropriate treatment?

Authors:  James D Douketis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Interface flow process audit: using the patient's career as a tracer of quality of care and of system organisation.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Unger; Bruno Marchal; Sylvie Dugas; Marie-Jeanne Wuidar; Daniel Burdet; Pierre Leemans; Jacques Unger
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.120

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.