Literature DB >> 9548163

Ovarian function during the use of a single contraceptive implant: Implanon compared with Norplant.

L Mäkäräinen1, A van Beek, L Tuomivaara, B Asplund, H Coelingh Bennink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanism of action of Implanon, a single-rod contraceptive implant containing etonogestrel, in healthy women during 3 years.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized comparison with Norplant. The study was conducted for 2 years in Sweden but was extended to 3 years in Finland.
SETTING: Two outpatient clinics. PATIENT(S): Thirty-two healthy women who were between 18 and 40 years of age with normal ovulatory cycles. Seven women receiving Implanon and three receiving Norplant participated in the third year. INTERVENTION(S): On or between days 1 and 5 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle, the subjects received either the etonogestrel-containing implant (Implanon) or the levonorgestrel-containing implant (Norplant). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ultrasonography was performed and/or progesterone concentrations were determined to confirm ovulation in a control cycle. Follicular development, endometrial thickness, and serum concentrations of 17beta-estradiol and progesterone were assessed twice per week during 4-week periods at regular intervals and after implant removal for 6 weeks to monitor return of ovulation. Times required to remove the respective implants were evaluated, as were possible complications. RESULT(S): Seven women who received Implanon and three who received Norplant completed 3 years of study. There were no pregnancies. Ovulation was observed for the first time with Norplant after 18 months. The first ovulation with Implanon was observed after 30 months. Mean endometrial thickness was <4 mm during treatment with Implanon from month 12 onward. The mean (+/-SD) time to remove Implanon was 5.9 +/- 3.4 minutes. The mean (+/-SD) time to remove Norplant was 17.9 +/- 9.9 minutes. Ovulation resumed promptly after the use of either implant. CONCLUSION(S): Results from this study provide convincing evidence of 3-year contraceptive efficacy with Implanon, mainly by ovulation inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9548163     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

Review 1.  Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.

Authors:  J Power; R French; F Cowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

2.  Ultrasound-guided removal of Implanon devices.

Authors:  T Persaud; M Walling; T Geoghegan; O Buckley; H Stunell; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Amy Stoddard; Colleen McNicholas; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Alternative Insertion Site of Nexplanon: Description of a Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Guglielmo Stabile; Carmelina Foti; Denise Mordeglia; Davide De Santo; Francesco Paolo Mangino; Antonio Simone Laganà; Giuseppe Ricci
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of biodegradable implants for hormone replacement therapy: effect of system design and PK-PD relationship.

Authors:  S Lin; P Y Chao; Y W Chien; S Sayani; S Kuma; M Mason; T Wes; A Yang; D Monkhouse
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and serum concentrations of progestins used in contraception.

Authors:  Alexis J Bick; Renate Louw-du Toit; Salndave B Skosana; Donita Africander; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 13.400

8.  Reduced Effectiveness of Contraceptive Implants for Women Taking the Antiretroviral Efavirenz (EFV): Still Good Enough and for How Long?

Authors:  James D Shelton
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2015-12-08

9.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive.

Authors:  Heather Hohmann
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.