Literature DB >> 14727875

In vitro and in vivo evaluations of biodegradable implants for hormone replacement therapy: effect of system design and PK-PD relationship.

S Lin1, P Y Chao, Y W Chien, S Sayani, S Kuma, M Mason, T Wes, A Yang, D Monkhouse.   

Abstract

This investigation evaluated the feasibility of using subdermally implantable devices fabricated by nonconventional 3-dimensional printing technology for controlled delivery of ethinyl estradiol (EE2). In vitro release kinetics of EE2 and in vivo pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in ovariectomized New Zealand White rabbits were carried out to study 3 implant prototypes: implant I (single-channel EE2 distribution in polycaprolactone polymer core), implant II (homogeneous EE2 distribution in polycaprolactone polymer matrix), and implant III (concentration-gradient EE2 distribution in polycaprolactone and poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) (50:50 matrix). EE2 was found to be released from all the implants in a nonlinear pattern with an order of implant III > implant II > implant I. The noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma EE2 profiles in rabbits indicated a significant difference (p < .05) in Cmax, tmax, and mean residence time between implant I and implants II and III, but no difference in the area under the plasma concentration time curves calculated by trapezoidal rule (AUC) among the implants. For pharmacodynamic studies, endogenous follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were observed to be suppressed following implantation of all implants, which demonstrated that a therapeutically effective dose of EE2 had been delivered. Furthermore, the noncompartmental analysis of plasma FSH and LH profiles in rabbits showed a significant difference (p < .05) in AUC and the mean residence time between implant III and implants I and II. A good in vivo/in vitro relationship was observed between daily amounts of EE2 released and plasma profiles of EE2 for all implants. This relationship suggests that plasma profiles of EE2 could be predicted from in vitro measurement of daily amount of EE2 released. Therefore, performing in vitro drug release studies may aid in the development of an EE2 implant with the desired in vivo release rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 14727875      PMCID: PMC2750581          DOI: 10.1208/pt020316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  17 in total

Review 1.  Advanced and controlled drug delivery systems in clinical disease management.

Authors:  J R Brouwers
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1996-10

2.  Kinetics and mechanism of release from glyceryl monostearate-based implants: evaluation of release in a gel simulating in vivo implantation.

Authors:  S Allababidi; J C Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Ovarian function during the use of a single contraceptive implant: Implanon compared with Norplant.

Authors:  L Mäkäräinen; A van Beek; L Tuomivaara; B Asplund; H Coelingh Bennink
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Comparative investigation of drug delivery of collagen implants saturated in antibiotic solutions and a sponge containing gentamicin.

Authors:  Z Wachol-Drewek; M Pfeiffer; E Scholl
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of site-specific cefazolin delivery using biodegradable implants in the prevention of post-operative wound infections.

Authors:  S Allababidi; J C Shah
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous morphine pellets in the rat.

Authors:  B C Yoburn; J Chen; T Huang; C E Inturrisi
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  In vitro and in vivo release of ciprofloxacin from PLGA 50:50 implants.

Authors:  M Ramchandani; D Robinson
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  1998-07-31       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Development of a multiple-drug delivery implant for intraocular management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Authors:  T Zhou; H Lewis; R E Foster; S P Schwendeman
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  1998-11-13       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 9.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  A J Coukell; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous naltrexone pellets in the rat.

Authors:  B C Yoburn; A H Cohen; C E Inturrisi
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enhanced activity of punicalagin delivered via polymeric implants against benzo[a]pyrene-induced DNA adducts.

Authors:  Farrukh Aqil; Manicka V Vadhanam; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Shape-Memory Terpolymer Rods with 17-β-estradiol for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases: an In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Artur Turek; Edyta Olakowska; Aleksandra Borecka; Henryk Janeczek; Michał Sobota; Joanna Jaworska; Bożena Kaczmarczyk; Bożena Jarząbek; Arkadiusz Gruchlik; Marcin Libera; Arkadiusz Liśkiewicz; Halina Jędrzejowska-Szypułka; Janusz Kasperczyk
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.200

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.