Literature DB >> 9545069

Comparison of secretory responses as measured by membrane capacitance and by amperometry.

M Haller1, C Heinemann, R H Chow, R Heidelberger, E Neher.   

Abstract

We have compared capacitance and amperometric measurements in bovine chromaffin cells when secretion was elicited by flash photolysis of caged-calcium or step depolarizations. Total amperometric charge depended linearly on the amount of capacitance increase in both types of experiments. Furthermore, the properties of resolvable amperometric spikes after flashes were comparable to those observed after depolarizations, and their timing was compatible with the rate of capacitance increase. For a more detailed comparison, we used Monte Carlo simulations of multiple amperometric events occurring randomly over the surface of a sphere and summing together, to generate a reference amperometric signal for a given measured capacitance increase. Even after correction for endocytotic processes, the time courses of the integrated experimental records lagged behind the integrated Monte Carlo records by approximately 50 ms in flash and depolarization experiments. This delay was larger by approximately 40 ms than what can be expected from the "pre-foot delay" or the foot duration. Possible sources for the remaining delay could be diffusional barriers like the patch-pipette and the chamber bottom, which are not taken into account in the model. We also applied a novel type of fluctuation analysis to estimate the relative quantum size of an amperometric event. On average the estimates from experimental amperometric traces, in both flash and depolarization experiments, were 3-5 times smaller than estimates from simulated ones. This discrepancy can be due to contributions to the amperometric current from small vesicles, preferred release from cellular regions orientated toward the chamber bottom, or abundance of "foot-only" events. In conclusion, amperometric signals in flash and depolarization experiments displayed similar delayed average time courses and a lower estimate for the relative quantum size compared to the modeled amperometric signals. However, individual amperometric spikes were in agreement with expectations derived from capacitance signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9545069      PMCID: PMC1299551          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77917-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  33 in total

1.  Analysis of diffusional broadening of vesicular packets of catecholamines released from biological cells during exocytosis.

Authors:  T J Schroeder; J A Jankowski; K T Kawagoe; R M Wightman; C Lefrou; C Amatore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Release of secretory products during transient vesicle fusion.

Authors:  G Alvarez de Toledo; R Fernández-Chacón; J M Fernández
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A Ca-dependent early step in the release of catecholamines from adrenal chromaffin cells.

Authors:  L von Rüden; E Neher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Temporal characteristics of quantal secretion of catecholamines from adrenal medullary cells.

Authors:  J A Jankowski; T J Schroeder; E L Ciolkowski; R M Wightman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Quantal secretion of catecholamines measured from individual bovine adrenal medullary cells permeabilized with digitonin.

Authors:  J A Jankowski; T J Schroeder; R W Holz; R M Wightman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mobile and immobile calcium buffers in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells.

Authors:  Z Zhou; E Neher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Delay in vesicle fusion revealed by electrochemical monitoring of single secretory events in adrenal chromaffin cells.

Authors:  R H Chow; L von Rüden; E Neher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A two-step model of secretion control in neuroendocrine cells.

Authors:  C Heinemann; L von Rüden; R H Chow; E Neher
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Multiple calcium-dependent processes related to secretion in bovine chromaffin cells.

Authors:  E Neher; R S Zucker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Temporally resolved catecholamine spikes correspond to single vesicle release from individual chromaffin cells.

Authors:  R M Wightman; J A Jankowski; R T Kennedy; K T Kawagoe; T J Schroeder; D J Leszczyszyn; J A Near; E J Diliberto; O H Viveros
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  33 in total

1.  Early requirement for alpha-SNAP and NSF in the secretory cascade in chromaffin cells.

Authors:  T Xu; U Ashery; R D Burgoyne; E Neher
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Ca(2+)-dependent activator protein for secretion is critical for the fusion of dense-core vesicles with the membrane in calf adrenal chromaffin cells.

Authors:  A Elhamdani; T F Martin; J A Kowalchyk; C R Artalejo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sustained stimulation of exocytosis triggers continuous membrane retrieval in rat pituitary somatotrophs.

Authors:  G Kilic; J K Angleson; A J Cochilla; I Nussinovitch; W J Betz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Formation, stabilisation and fusion of the readily releasable pool of secretory vesicles.

Authors:  Jakob Balslev Sørensen
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Exocytosis from pancreatic β-cells: mathematical modelling of the exit of low-molecular-weight granule content.

Authors:  Juris Galvanovskis; Matthias Braun; Patrik Rorsman
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Membrane bending energy and fusion pore kinetics in Ca(2+)-triggered exocytosis.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Meyer B Jackson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Exocytosis and endocytosis of small vesicles in PC12 cells studied with TEPIQ (two-photon extracellular polar-tracer imaging-based quantification) analysis.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Liu; Takuya Kishimoto; Hiroyasu Hatakeyama; Tomomi Nemoto; Noriko Takahashi; Haruo Kasai
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Sequential compound exocytosis of large dense-core vesicles in PC12 cells studied with TEPIQ (two-photon extracellular polar-tracer imaging-based quantification) analysis.

Authors:  Takuya Kishimoto; Ting-Ting Liu; Hiroyasu Hatakeyama; Tomomi Nemoto; Noriko Takahashi; Haruo Kasai
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Correlation between vesicle quantal size and fusion pore release in chromaffin cell exocytosis.

Authors:  Christian Amatore; Stéphane Arbault; Imelda Bonifas; Yann Bouret; Marie Erard; Andy G Ewing; Leslie A Sombers
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Electrochemical measurement of quantal exocytosis using microchips.

Authors:  Kevin D Gillis; Xin A Liu; Andrea Marcantoni; Valentina Carabelli
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.