Literature DB >> 9542633

Sensitivity of isoenzyme analysis for the detection of interspecies cell line cross-contamination.

R W Nims1, A P Shoemaker, M A Bauernschub, L J Rec, J W Harbell.   

Abstract

The analysis of the gel electrophoresis banding patterns and relative migration distances for the individual isoforms of intracellular enzymes, such as lactate dehydrogenase, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and malate dehydrogenase, is used routinely in the biopharmaceutical industry for confirmation of cell line species of origin. In the present study, the sensitivity of the technique (AuthentiKit, Innovative Chemistry, Marshfield, MA) for determining interspecies cell line cross-contamination was examined. Extracts were prepared from a CHO-K1 line (AA8, Chinese hamster), MRC-5 (human) cells, and L929 (mouse) cells and from several proportional mixtures of the various binary combinations of cells. The isoenzymes were analyzed according to standard procedures for the technique. Contamination of MRC-5 cells with CHO-K1 or with L929 cells was clearly detectable with each enzyme analyzed. Similarly, the contamination of L929 or CHO-K1 cells with MRC-5 cells was readily apparent with each enzyme. On the other hand, contamination of CHO-K1 cells with L929 cells was only detected with lactate dehydrogenase analysis, and contamination of L929 cells with CHO-K1 cells was not detected with any of the four enzymes examined. For the latter case, the analysis of an additional enzyme (peptidase B) was required. The results indicate that interspecies cross-contamination should be detectable with isoenzyme analysis if the contaminating cells represent at least 10% of the total cell population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9542633     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-998-0050-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  10 in total

1.  Cells, lines and DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  R A MacLeod; B Haene; H G Drexler
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  The identification and monitoring of cell line specificity.

Authors:  W A Nelson-Rees
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1978

Review 3.  The seed stock concept and quality control for cell lines.

Authors:  R J Hay
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Cell culture quality control by rapid isoenzymatic characterization.

Authors:  D M Halton; W D Peterson; B Hukku
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1983-01

5.  Cell culture characterization: monitoring for cell identification.

Authors:  W D Peterson; W F Simpson; B Hukku
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Isoenzyme characterization of animal cell cultures.

Authors:  F Montes de Oca; M L Macy; J E Shannon
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1969-11

7.  A molecular approach to the identification and individualization of human and animal cells in culture: isozyme and allozyme genetic signatures.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; J E Shannon; M H Gail
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1980-02

8.  Isoenzyme analysis as a rapid method for the examination of the species identity of cell cultures.

Authors:  K G Steube; D Grunicke; H G Drexler
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Distinction of seventy-one cultured human tumor cell lines by polymorphic enzyme analysis.

Authors:  W C Wright; W P Daniels; J Fogh
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Baculovirus and insect cell gene expression: review of baculovirus biotechnology.

Authors:  R M Patterson; J K Selkirk; B A Merrick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  18 in total

1.  Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines.

Authors:  J R Masters; J A Thomson; B Daly-Burns; Y A Reid; W G Dirks; P Packer; L H Toji; T Ohno; H Tanabe; C F Arlett; L R Kelland; M Harrison; A Virmani; T H Ward; K L Ayres; P G Debenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quality of Cell Products: Authenticity, Identity, Genomic Stability and Status of Differentiation.

Authors:  Kurt E J Dittmar; Meike Simann; Nadia Zghoul; Oliver Schön; Wilhelm Meyring; Horst Hannig; Lars Macke; Wilhelm G Dirks; Konstantin Miller; Henk S P Garritsen; Werner Lindenmaier
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Establishment and biological characterization of fibroblast cell line from the Langshan chicken.

Authors:  W Guan; X He; L Li; H Liang; Q Zhao; Y Pu; Y-H Ma
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 4.  Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Species identification of animal cells by nested PCR targeted to mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Kazumi Ono; Motonobu Satoh; Touho Yoshida; Yutaka Ozawa; Arihiro Kohara; Masao Takeuchi; Hiroshi Mizusawa; Hidekazu Sawada
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Establishment and characterization of a fibroblast cell line from the Mongolian horse.

Authors:  Lin-feng Li; Wei-jun Guan; Yue Hua; Xiu-juan Bai; Yue-hui Ma
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Identity tests: determination of cell line cross-contamination.

Authors:  C M Cabrera; F Cobo; A Nieto; J L Cortés; R M Montes; P Catalina; A Concha
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  An alternative method to isoenzyme profile for cell line identification and interspecies cross-contaminations: cytochrome b PCR-RLFP analysis.

Authors:  Claretta G Losi; Stefania Ferrari; Enrico Sossi; Riccardo Villa; Maura Ferrari
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Reproducibility: changing the policies and culture of cell line authentication.

Authors:  Leonard P Freedman; Mark C Gibson; Stephen P Ethier; Howard R Soule; Richard M Neve; Yvonne A Reid
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 10.  Short tandem repeat profiling: part of an overall strategy for reducing the frequency of cell misidentification.

Authors:  Raymond W Nims; Greg Sykes; Karin Cottrill; Pranvera Ikonomi; Eugene Elmore
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.