Literature DB >> 9539349

The offset cortical potential: an electrical correlate of movement inhibition in man.

J C Rothwell1, K Higuchi, J A Obeso.   

Abstract

Nine normal subjects were asked to make either a brisk isometric pinch of a force transducer held between the forefinger and thumb, or to hold a pinch for approximately 15 s and then release the force suddenly without any overt antagonist contraction. EEG activity was averaged about the onset or offset of EMG activity, and movements were made in the subjects' own time. All subjects found the task simple. The EEG activity preceding offset of contraction (offset cortical potential) was significantly smaller in lateral leads than that seen before onset of contraction. Midline activation was similar in both tasks. We suggest that in the onset task, motor cortex activity related to the act to be performed contributes substantially to the EEG potentials in lateral leads. This activity is absent in the offset task which requires only withdrawal of tonic input to motor cortex. Midline activity, common to both onset and offset tasks, could reflect timing, attentional, or other processes. The results are discussed in relation to previous data from an isotonic relaxation task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539349     DOI: 10.1002/mds.870130221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  18 in total

1.  Dissociation of motor preparation from memory and attentional processes using movement-related cortical potentials.

Authors:  G Dirnberger; M Reumann; W Endl; G Lindinger; W Lang; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Activities of the primary and supplementary motor areas increase in preparation and execution of voluntary muscle relaxation: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  K Toma; M Honda; T Hanakawa; T Okada; H Fukuyama; A Ikeda; S Nishizawa; J Konishi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Relaxation from a voluntary contraction is preceded by increased excitability of motor cortical inhibitory circuits.

Authors:  Alessandro Buccolieri; Giovanni Abbruzzese; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Quincy J Almeida; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during force generation and relaxation.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cortical and subcortical mechanisms for precisely controlled force generation and force relaxation.

Authors:  Matthew B Spraker; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Interaction between simultaneous contraction and relaxation in different limbs.

Authors:  Kouki Kato; Tetsuro Muraoka; Takatoshi Higuchi; Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Change in motor cortex activation for muscle release by motor learning.

Authors:  Kenichi Sugawara
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2020-12-04

9.  Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.