Literature DB >> 9539031

Nonlinearity of radiation health effects.

M Pollycove1.   

Abstract

The prime concern of radiation protection policy since 1959 has been to protect DNA from damage. In 1994 the United Nations Scientific Community on the Effects of Atomic Radiation focused on biosystem response to radiation with its report Adaptive Responses to Radiation of Cells and Organisms. The 1995 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements report Principles and Application of Collective Dose in Radiation Protection states that because no human data provides direct support for the linear nonthreshold hypothesis (LNT), confidence in LNT is based on the biophysical concept that the passage of a single charged particle could cause damage to DNA that would result in cancer. Several statistically significant epidemiologic studies contradict the validity of this concept by showing risk decrements, i.e., hormesis, of cancer mortality and mortality from all causes in populations exposed to low-dose radiation. Unrepaired low-dose radiation damage to DNA is negligible compared to metabolic damage. The DNA damage-control biosystem is physiologically operative on both metabolic and radiation damage and effected predominantly by free radicals. The DNA damage-control biosystem is suppressed by high dose and stimulated by low-dose radiation. The hormetic effect of low-dose radiation may be explained by its increase of biosystem efficiency. Improved DNA damage control reduces persistent mis- or unrepaired DNA damage i.e., the number of mutations that accumulate during a lifetime. This progressive accumulation of gene mutations in stem cells is associated with decreasing DNA damage control, aging, and malignancy. Recognition of the positive health effects produced by adaptive responses to low-dose radiation would result in a realistic assessment of the environmental risk of radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539031      PMCID: PMC1533290          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s1363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  13 in total

Review 1.  Biology of aging.

Authors:  D W Ross
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 2.  Spontaneous DNA damage and its significance for the "negligible dose" controversy in radiation protection.

Authors:  D Billen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Mechanisms and evolution of aging.

Authors:  G J Lithgow; T B Kirkwood
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cell suicide in health and disease.

Authors:  R C Duke; D M Ojcius; J D Young
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  T cell potentiation by low dose ionizing radiation: possible mechanisms.

Authors:  T Makinodan; S J James
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 6.  The causes and prevention of cancer.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold; W C Willett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Some nonscientific influences on radiation protection standards and practice. The 1980 Sievert Lecture.

Authors:  L S Taylor
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  DNA repair and aging in basal cell carcinoma: a molecular epidemiology study.

Authors:  Q Wei; G M Matanoski; E R Farmer; M A Hedayati; L Grossman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; E S Gilbert; L Carpenter; G Howe; I Kato; B K Armstrong; V Beral; G Cowper; A Douglas; J Fix
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; G J Sherman; J P Lindsay; M J Yaffe; P J Dinner; H A Risch; D L Preston
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

2.  Childhood leukaemia incidence in Hungary, 1973-2002. Interpolation model for analysing the possible effects of the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  Szabolcs Török; Gábor Borgulya; Péter Lobmayer; Zsuzsanna Jakab; Dezsö Schuler; György Fekete
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Single-photon emission computed tomography in neurotherapeutics.

Authors:  Michael D Devous
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-04

4.  On "phantom risks" associated with diagnostic ionizing radiation: evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

5.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

6.  Regulatory-Science: Biphasic Cancer Models or the LNT-Not Just a Matter of Biology!

Authors:  Paolo F Ricci; Ian R Sammis
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Radiobiological basis of low-dose irradiation in prevention and therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Myron Pollycove
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Beneficial effects of low dose radiation in response to the oncogenic KRAS induced cellular transformation.

Authors:  Rae-Kwon Kim; Min-Jung Kim; Ki Moon Seong; Neha Kaushik; Yongjoon Suh; Ki-Chun Yoo; Yan-Hong Cui; Young Woo Jin; Seon Young Nam; Su-Jae Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Investigation of natural effective gamma dose rates case study: Ardebil Province in Iran.

Authors:  Sadegh Hazrati; Abbas Naghizadeh Baghi; Hadi Sadeghi; Manouchehr Barak; Sahar Zivari; Soheila Rahimzadeh
Journal:  Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2012-08-02

10.  A Novel Murine Model of Radiation Keratopathy.

Authors:  Deshea L Harris; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.