Literature DB >> 9539029

The use of biochemical and molecular parameters to estimate dose-response relationships at low levels of exposure.

M E Andersen1, H A Barton.   

Abstract

Biomarkers based on alterations in molecular and biochemical parameters may be useful in chemical risk assessment for establishing the presence of an exposure, ranking relative risks among exposed individuals, and estimating risks at low levels of exposure. Because it is unlikely that the relation between toxic responses and the degree of alteration in the biomarker is equivalent at all doses, quantification of risks at low levels is not necessarily more accurate using these biomarkers for extrapolation. The application of response biomarkers for risk evaluation at low levels of exposure is discussed in relation to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a compound that causes induction of cytochromes CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 in liver and other tissues. CYP1A1 induction in liver increases monotonically with TCDD dosage; however, several of the dose-response curves for hepatic effects of TCDD are U-shaped. The U-shaped dose-response curve for hepatic tumor promotion appears to result because the integrated toxicologic response depends on multiple underlying processes--mitosuppression, toxicity, and cell proliferation--each of which has a different dose-response relationship with respect to TCDD. Although dose-response relationships for the biomarkers are not expected to duplicate the complex shapes seen with the integrated responses, measurements and pharmacodynamic modeling of the changes in these molecular and biochemical parameters can still be useful for obtaining an upperbound risk estimate at low levels of exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539029      PMCID: PMC1533297          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s1349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  30 in total

1.  Modeling the number and size of hepatic focal lesions following exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD.

Authors:  C J Portier; C D Sherman; M Kohn; L Edler; A Kopp-Schneider; R M Maronpot; G Lucier
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  The AH-receptor: genetics, structure and function.

Authors:  H I Swanson; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  1993-10

3.  Exposure to TCDD during development permanently alters reproductive function in male Long Evans rats and hamsters: reduced ejaculated and epididymal sperm numbers and sex accessory gland weights in offspring with normal androgenic status.

Authors:  L E Gray; W R Kelce; E Monosson; J S Ostby; L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Inhibitory effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on rat hepatocyte proliferation induced by 2/3 partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  J W Bauman; T L Goldsworthy; C S Dunn; T R Fox
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for 2,3,7,8-tetrabromodibenzo-p-dioxin (TBDD) in the rat: tissue distribution and CYP1A induction.

Authors:  L B Kedderis; J J Mills; M E Andersen; L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  The human CYP1A2 gene and induction by 3-methylcholanthrene. A region of DNA that supports AH-receptor binding and promoter-specific induction.

Authors:  L C Quattrochi; T Vu; R H Tukey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-03-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A mechanistic model of effects of dioxin on gene expression in the rat liver.

Authors:  M C Kohn; G W Lucier; G C Clark; C Sewall; A M Tritscher; C J Portier
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Inhibition of apoptosis during 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated tumour promotion in rat liver.

Authors:  S Stinchcombe; A Buchmann; K W Bock; M Schwarz
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 9.  Negative selection in hepatic tumor promotion in relation to cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  M E Andersen; J J Mills; R L Jirtle; W F Greenlee
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Dose response for TCDD promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis in rats initiated with DEN: histologic, biochemical, and cell proliferation endpoints.

Authors:  R R Maronpot; J F Foley; K Takahashi; T Goldsworthy; G Clark; A Tritscher; C Portier; G Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of the dioxin-responsive element cluster between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology.

Authors:  Manabu Nukaya; Susan Moran; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Induction of oxidative stress responses by dioxin and other ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  John F Reichard; Timothy P Dalton; Howard G Shertzer; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine (PNA) Accumulates in Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) Liver Activating the Detoxification Pathway.

Authors:  Tash-Lynn L Colson; Shane R de Solla; Vimal K Balakrishnan; John Toito; Valerie S Langlois
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.151

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.