Literature DB >> 8143597

Dose response for TCDD promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis in rats initiated with DEN: histologic, biochemical, and cell proliferation endpoints.

R R Maronpot1, J F Foley, K Takahashi, T Goldsworthy, G Clark, A Tritscher, C Portier, G Lucier.   

Abstract

The present study examines the dose-response relationship for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) promotion of histologic and biochemical parameters by using a two-stage model for hepatocarcinogenesis in female Sprague-Dawley rats initiated with a single intraperitoneal dose of 175 mg of diethylnitrosamine (DEN)/kg body weight at 70 days of age. Starting 2 weeks after initiation, treatment groups of 8-10 rats were given TCDD by gavage in corn oil once every 2 weeks for 30 weeks. Doses were 3.5, 10.7, 35.7, and 125 ng TCDD/kg body weight/day. A significant body weight reduction was present in the noninitiated group that received 125 ng TCDD. Relative liver weight was statistically increased in initiated rats treated with > or = 10.7 ng TCDD and in noninitiated rats treated with > or = 35.7 ng TCDD. Histopathologic evidence of cytotoxicity was dose-related in all TCDD-treated groups. There was a statistically significant dose response in the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) S-phase labeling index (LI) in the DEN-initiated rats (p < 0.01) and a marginally significant trend in the saline-treated rats (p = 0.10), but proliferating cell nuclear antigen S-phase LI and growth fraction within altered hepatic foci showed no increase. Among the DEN-initiated groups there was a significant increase in glutathione S-transferase altered hepatic foci stereological parameters in the 125 ng TCDD group. This study demonstrates that dose-response relationships for TCDD's effects on cell proliferation growth of altered hepatic foci are different from previously reported effects on P450 gene expression, indicating that different biological or biochemical responses may exhibit different dose-response relationships.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8143597      PMCID: PMC1519881          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  33 in total

1.  Reliable stereological method for estimating the number of microscopic hepatocellular foci from their transections.

Authors:  T D Pugh; J H King; H Koen; D Nychka; J Chover; G Wahba; Y H He; S Goldfarb
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Tumour promotion by TCDD in skin of HRS/J hairless mice.

Authors:  A Poland; D Palen; E Glover
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Application of quantitative stereology to the evaluation of enzyme-altered foci in rat liver.

Authors:  H A Campbell; H C Pitot; V R Potter; B A Laishes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Inhalation exposure to a hepatocarcinogenic concentration of methylene chloride does not induce sustained replicative DNA synthesis in hepatocytes of female B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  J F Foley; P D Tuck; T V Ton; M Frost; F Kari; M W Anderson; R R Maronpot
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Ligand/receptor binding for 2,3,7,8-TCDD: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  C Portier; A Tritscher; M Kohn; C Sewall; G Clark; L Edler; D Hoel; G Lucier
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1993-01

6.  Threshold dose dependence in phenobarbital promotion of rat hepatocarcinogenesis initiated by diethylnitrosamine.

Authors:  A Maekawa; H Onodera; H Ogasawara; Y Matsushima; K Mitsumori; Y Hayashi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  An estimate of the maximum in vivo covalent binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to rat liver protein, ribosomal RNA, and DNA.

Authors:  A Poland; E Glover
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Quantitative evaluation of the promotion by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin of hepatocarcinogenesis from diethylnitrosamine.

Authors:  H C Pitot; T Goldsworthy; H A Campbell; A Poland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A mechanistic model of effects of dioxin on gene expression in the rat liver.

Authors:  M C Kohn; G W Lucier; G C Clark; C Sewall; A M Tritscher; C J Portier
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  7 in total

1.  Histopathological Alterations in the Livers of Chronic Hepatitis Patients Exposed to Agent Orange/Dioxin in Vietnam.

Authors:  Phu Quang Pham; Vuong Ba Nguyen; Tai The Pham; Nhuong Xuan Duong; Ha Trong Nguyen; Quang Van Ha; Thuan Duc Nguyen; Tuan Minh Hoang; Dong Tien Dinh; Quynh Thi Nhu Tran; Linh Kim Bui; Thuy Thi Vu; Manh Van Phan; Tuan Minh Luong; Khanh Nguyen; Dung Anh Vu; Thao Ngoc Pham
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 2.  Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME.

Authors:  Patricio Godoy; Nicola J Hewitt; Ute Albrecht; Melvin E Andersen; Nariman Ansari; Sudin Bhattacharya; Johannes Georg Bode; Jennifer Bolleyn; Christoph Borner; Jan Böttger; Albert Braeuning; Robert A Budinsky; Britta Burkhardt; Neil R Cameron; Giovanni Camussi; Chong-Su Cho; Yun-Jaie Choi; J Craig Rowlands; Uta Dahmen; Georg Damm; Olaf Dirsch; María Teresa Donato; Jian Dong; Steven Dooley; Dirk Drasdo; Rowena Eakins; Karine Sá Ferreira; Valentina Fonsato; Joanna Fraczek; Rolf Gebhardt; Andrew Gibson; Matthias Glanemann; Chris E P Goldring; María José Gómez-Lechón; Geny M M Groothuis; Lena Gustavsson; Christelle Guyot; David Hallifax; Seddik Hammad; Adam Hayward; Dieter Häussinger; Claus Hellerbrand; Philip Hewitt; Stefan Hoehme; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; J Brian Houston; Jens Hrach; Kiyomi Ito; Hartmut Jaeschke; Verena Keitel; Jens M Kelm; B Kevin Park; Claus Kordes; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Edward L LeCluyse; Peng Lu; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Anna Lutz; Daniel J Maltman; Madlen Matz-Soja; Patrick McMullen; Irmgard Merfort; Simon Messner; Christoph Meyer; Jessica Mwinyi; Dean J Naisbitt; Andreas K Nussler; Peter Olinga; Francesco Pampaloni; Jingbo Pi; Linda Pluta; Stefan A Przyborski; Anup Ramachandran; Vera Rogiers; Cliff Rowe; Celine Schelcher; Kathrin Schmich; Michael Schwarz; Bijay Singh; Ernst H K Stelzer; Bruno Stieger; Regina Stöber; Yuichi Sugiyama; Ciro Tetta; Wolfgang E Thasler; Tamara Vanhaecke; Mathieu Vinken; Thomas S Weiss; Agata Widera; Courtney G Woods; Jinghai James Xu; Kathy M Yarborough; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Animal models of human response to dioxins.

Authors:  J A Grassman; S A Masten; N J Walker; G W Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  The use of biochemical and molecular parameters to estimate dose-response relationships at low levels of exposure.

Authors:  M E Andersen; H A Barton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Modeling drug- and chemical-induced hepatotoxicity with systems biology approaches.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Lisl K M Shoda; Qiang Zhang; Courtney G Woods; Brett A Howell; Scott Q Siler; Jeffrey L Woodhead; Yuching Yang; Patrick McMullen; Paul B Watkins; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  Comparisons of estimated human body burdens of dioxinlike chemicals and TCDD body burdens in experimentally exposed animals.

Authors:  M J DeVito; L S Birnbaum; W H Farland; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  A biomarker approach to assessing xenobiotic exposure in Atlantic tomcod from the North American Atlantic coast.

Authors:  I I Wirgin; C Grunwald; S Courtenay; G L Kreamer; W L Reichert; J E Stein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.