Literature DB >> 9538357

Respiratory allergy in laboratory animal workers: a retrospective cohort study using pre-employment screening data.

H Kruize1, W Post, D Heederik, B Martens, A Hollander, E van der Beek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the role of exposure, atopy, and smoking in the development of laboratory animal allergy (LAA) in a retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Between 1977 and 1993, 225 people received a pre-employment screening when they started a job at a Dutch research institute where they were going to work with laboratory animals. After active follow up 136 of them (60.4%) could be traced and were sent a questionnaire with extensive questions on allergic symptoms, smoking habits, and job history. 122 people (89.7%) sent back a completed questionnaire. Those who were accepted for a job at the institute and did not have allergic symptoms at the start of the job were selected as cohort members. After selecting people with complete data on start and end date of jobs, exposure intensity, atopy, and smoking, the cohort consisted of 99 people with an average time of follow up of 9.7 years. LAA was defined as a positive response to a set of questions in the questionnaire. The mean number of hours a week a person was exposed to laboratory animals at entry of the cohort was used as a surrogate for exposure, and was divided into four categories.
RESULTS: 19 cohort members (19.2%) reported LAA. More people with asthmatic symptoms were found in the high exposure categories. More atopic than non-atopic people reported asthmatic symptoms (13% v 6%). The mean time until development of symptoms of LAA was about 109 months in non-atopic people (n = 9), and 45 months in atopic people (n = 10) (t test; P < 0.05). Time until development of symptoms of LAA was shorter at a higher intensity of exposure, except for those exposed for less than two hours a week. A proportional hazard regression analysis showed that exposure and atopy were significant determinants of LAA. An increased relative risk (RR) was found for non-atopic people exposed to laboratory animal allergens for more than two hours a week. Atopic people had an even higher risk when exposed to laboratory animals for more than two hours a week (RR above 7.3). Sex, smoking, and age were not risk factors. More atopic than non-atopic people were absent from work or transferred because of allergies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that exposure and atopy are significant predictors of LAA and that the risk of developing LAA remained present for a much longer period (> 3 y) than considered before.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9538357      PMCID: PMC1128956          DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.11.830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  11 in total

Review 1.  Allergy to laboratory mice and rats: a review of the pathophysiology, epidemiology and clinical aspects.

Authors:  S Hunskaar; R T Fosse
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Atopy and airways reactivity in animal health technicians. A pilot study.

Authors:  R Das; I B Tager; T Gamsky; M B Schenker; S Royce; J R Balmes
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1992-01

3.  A follow-up study of laboratory animal exposed workers: the influence of atopy for the development of occupational asthma.

Authors:  L Sjöstedt; S Willers; P Orbaek
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective and cross-sectional study.

Authors:  T Kibby; G Powell; J Cromer
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1989-10

5.  Smoking, atopy, and laboratory animal allergy.

Authors:  K M Venables; J L Upton; E R Hawkins; R D Tee; J L Longbottom; A J Newman Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-10

6.  Cat and dog allergy and total IgE as risk factors of laboratory animal allergy.

Authors:  A Hollander; G Doekes; D Heederik
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Allergy to laboratory animals: a retrospective and a prospective study.

Authors:  G E Davies; A V Thompson; Z Niewola; G E Burrows; E L Teasdale; D J Bird; D A Phillips
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1983-11

8.  Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy on its development.

Authors:  P A Botham; G E Davies; E L Teasdale
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-09

9.  Prospective study of laboratory-animal allergy: factors predisposing to sensitization and development of allergic symptoms.

Authors:  A Renström; P Malmberg; K Larsson; B M Sundblad; P H Larsson
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 13.146

10.  Work related symptoms, sensitisation, and estimated exposure in workers not previously exposed to laboratory rats.

Authors:  P Cullinan; D Lowson; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; S Gordon; R D Tee; K M Venables; J C McDonald; A J Newman Taylor
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exposure assessment of high molecular weight sensitisers: contribution to occupational epidemiology and disease prevention.

Authors:  D Heederik; G Doekes; M J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Prevalence of occupational allergy in medical researchers exposed to laboratory animals.

Authors:  Basilua Andre Muzembo; Masamitsu Eitoku; Yuta Inaoka; Makiko Oogiku; Mitomo Kawakubo; Ryuta Tai; Momoko Takechi; Ken-ichi Hirabayashi; Naofumi Yoshida; Nlandu Roger Ngatu; Ryoji Hirota; Bernardus Sandjaya; Narufumi Suganuma
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.179

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.