OBJECTIVE: To compare vessel, lumen, and plaque volumes in atherosclerotic coronary lesions with inadequate compensatory enlargement versus lesions with adequate compensatory enlargement. DESIGN: 35 angiographically significant coronary lesions were examined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during motorised transducer pullback. Segments 20 mm in length were analysed using a validated automated three dimensional analysis system. IVUS was used to classify lesions as having inadequate (group I) or adequate (group II) compensatory enlargement. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in quantitative angiographic measurements and the IVUS minimum lumen cross sectional area between groups I (n = 15) and II (n = 20). In group I, the vessel cross sectional area was 13.3 (3.0) mm2 at the lesion site and 14.4 (3.6) mm2 at the distal reference (p < 0.01), whereas in group II it was 17.5 (5.6) mm2 at the lesion site and 14.0 (6.0) mm2 at the distal reference (p < 0.001). Vessel and plaque cross sectional areas were significantly smaller in group I than in group II (13.3 (3.0) v 17.5 (5.6) mm2, p < 0.01; and 10.9 (2.8) v 15.2 (4.9) mm2; p < 0.005). Similarly, vessel and plaque volume were smaller in group I (291.0 (61.0) v 353.7 (110.0) mm3, and 177.5 (48.4) v 228.0 (92.8) mm3, p < 0.05 for both). Lumen areas and volumes were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In lesions with inadequate compensatory enlargement, both vessel and plaque volume appear to be smaller than in lesions with adequate compensatory enlargement.
OBJECTIVE: To compare vessel, lumen, and plaque volumes in atherosclerotic coronary lesions with inadequate compensatory enlargement versus lesions with adequate compensatory enlargement. DESIGN: 35 angiographically significant coronary lesions were examined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during motorised transducer pullback. Segments 20 mm in length were analysed using a validated automated three dimensional analysis system. IVUS was used to classify lesions as having inadequate (group I) or adequate (group II) compensatory enlargement. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in quantitative angiographic measurements and the IVUS minimum lumen cross sectional area between groups I (n = 15) and II (n = 20). In group I, the vessel cross sectional area was 13.3 (3.0) mm2 at the lesion site and 14.4 (3.6) mm2 at the distal reference (p < 0.01), whereas in group II it was 17.5 (5.6) mm2 at the lesion site and 14.0 (6.0) mm2 at the distal reference (p < 0.001). Vessel and plaque cross sectional areas were significantly smaller in group I than in group II (13.3 (3.0) v 17.5 (5.6) mm2, p < 0.01; and 10.9 (2.8) v 15.2 (4.9) mm2; p < 0.005). Similarly, vessel and plaque volume were smaller in group I (291.0 (61.0) v 353.7 (110.0) mm3, and 177.5 (48.4) v 228.0 (92.8) mm3, p < 0.05 for both). Lumen areas and volumes were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In lesions with inadequate compensatory enlargement, both vessel and plaque volume appear to be smaller than in lesions with adequate compensatory enlargement.
Authors: K M Coy; J C Park; M C Fishbein; T Laas; G A Diamond; L Adler; G Maurer; R J Siegel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J A Mallery; J M Tobis; J Griffith; J Gessert; M McRae; O Moussabeck; M Bessen; M Moriuchi; W L Henry Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: K Rosenfield; D W Losordo; K Ramaswamy; J O Pastore; R E Langevin; S Razvi; B D Kosowsky; J M Isner Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D D McPherson; S J Sirna; L F Hiratzka; L Thorpe; M L Armstrong; M L Marcus; R E Kerber Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J B Hermiller; A N Tenaglia; K B Kisslo; H R Phillips; T M Bashore; R S Stack; C J Davidson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1993-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: C von Birgelen; W Klinkhart; G S Mintz; H Wieneke; D Baumgart; M Haude; T Bartel; S Sack; J Ge; R Erbel Journal: Heart Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: C von Birgelen; G S Mintz; E A de Vrey; P W Serruys; T Kimura; M Nobuyoshi; J J Popma; M B Leon; R Erbel; P J de Feyter Journal: Heart Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Saurabh S Dhawan; Ravi P Avati Nanjundappa; Jonathan R Branch; W Robert Taylor; Arshed A Quyyumi; Hanjoong Jo; Michael C McDaniel; Jin Suo; Don Giddens; Habib Samady Journal: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther Date: 2010-04
Authors: M A Costa; K Kozuma; A L Gaster; W J van Der Giessen; M Sabaté; D P Foley; I P Kay; J M Ligthart; P Thayssen; M J van Den Brand; P J de Feyter; P W Serruys Journal: Heart Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 5.994