Literature DB >> 9537221

The azimilide post-infarct survival evaluation (ALIVE) trial.

A J Camm1, R Karam, C M Pratt.   

Abstract

The AzimiLide post-Infarct surVival Evaluation (ALIVE) trial is a new clinical trial using an innovative design to examine the potential of azimilide, a novel type of antiarrhythmic, for improving survival in post myocardial infarction (MI) patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Azimilide is the first of a unique class of antiarrhythmic drugs that blocks both slow and rapid components of the delayed rectifier potassium currents in human myocardium. Preclinical studies have shown the drug to be effective in reducing cardiac tachyarrhythmias, even under ischemic conditions. Currently, azimilide is in Phase III trials for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. The ALIVE study design is based on lessons learned from the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials (CAST), the Survival With Oral d-Sotalol (SWORD) trial, and the European Myocardial Infarction Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT) and identifies recent post-MI patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. The hypothesis underlying this trial is that azimilide will improve survival in this patient population. The ALIVE trial is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial that will overcome the shortcomings of previous antiarrhythmic trials by using left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability as predictors to target a post-MI patient population at high risk of sudden death. The major inclusion criteria for the study are adult patients of either gender with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 15-35% who have had a recent MI (within 6-21 days). Additional stratification will be based on patients with heart rate variability < or = 20 U (heart rate variability index). Exclusion criteria include factors that may predispose a patient to nonarrhythmia-induced death or to low risk of sudden cardiac death caused by arrhythmia. Sample size is based on the assumption that the all-cause mortality rate (the primary endpoint) for 1 year in placebo patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (heart rate variability < or = 20 U) is 15% and that azimilide will decrease all-cause mortality by at least 45% in these patients. The trial consists of 3 groups-patients receiving 75 mg azimilide orally each day, patients receiving 100 mg azimilide orally each day, and patients receiving placebo. No dose adjustments for age, gender, renal or hepatic failure, or concomitant use of warfarin or digoxin are thought necessary with azimilide. Enrollment for the trial is expected to continue for 24 months, and treatment is scheduled to be administered for a 1-year follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9537221     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of newer antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; John Hynes; Soraya Samii; Jerry Luck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug actions and their clinical relevance for controlling disorders of cardiac rhythm.

Authors:  Uma Srivatsa; Nitin Wadhani; Bramah N Singh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Azimilide.

Authors:  D Clemett; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Ventricular Arrhythmias in Seniors with Heart Failure: Present Dilemmas and Therapeutic Considerations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tuoyo O Mene-Afejuku; Abayomi O Bamgboje; Modele O Ogunniyi; Ola Akinboboye; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Maintaining stability of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: antiarrhythmic drugs versus ablation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; John Hynes; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; Jerry Luck
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Short-period heart rate variability in the general population as compared to patients with acute myocardial infarction from the same source population.

Authors:  Bernhard Kuch; Toma Parvanov; Hans W Hense; Joerg Axmann; Heinz D Bolte
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 7.  Have sanctioned algorithms replaced empiric judgment in the selection process of antiarrhythmic drugs for the therapy for atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel; Paul Khairy; Denis Roy; Bernard Thibault; Peter Guerra; Mario Talajic; Marc Dubuc
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Arrhythmias in Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  B. John Hynes; Jerry C. Luck; Deborah L. Wolbrette; John Boehmer; Gerald V. Naccarelli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2002-12

10.  Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Meaghan Lunney; Marinella Ruospo; Patrizia Natale; Robert R Quinn; Paul E Ronksley; Ioannis Konstantinidis; Suetonia C Palmer; Marcello Tonelli; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Pietro Ravani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.