Literature DB >> 14574034

A review of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of newer antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation.

Gerald V Naccarelli1, Deborah L Wolbrette, Luna Bhatta, Mazhar Khan, John Hynes, Soraya Samii, Jerry Luck.   

Abstract

Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of anti- arrhythmic drugs for terminating atrial fibrillation have demonstrated that rate control drugs have little to no added efficacy compared to placebo; however, spontaneous conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation is common. Antiarrhythmic drugs such as oral dofetilide, oral bolus-flecainide and propafenone and intravenous ibutilide all have a role in terminating atrial fibrillation. Active comparator trials have demonstrated that amiodarone is more efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm than propafenone and sotalol. Multiple trials have demonstrated the safety of amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide and azimilide in a post-myocardial infarction population and amiodarone and dofetilide in a congestive heart failure population. Newer antiarrhythmic agents, some with novel mechanisms of action, will add to the pharmacologic armamentarium in treating atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14574034     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026240625182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  46 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular drugs. Dofetilide.

Authors:  J P Mounsey; J P DiMarco
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Electrophysiological effects of dronedarone (SR33589), a noniodinated benzofuran derivative, in the rabbit heart : comparison with amiodarone.

Authors:  W Sun; J S Sarma; B N Singh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Sotalol versus quinidine for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current conversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S Juul-Möller; N Edvardsson; N Rehnqvist-Ahlberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Safety of oral propafenone in the conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a prospective parallel placebo-controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  A Capucci; G Q Villani; D Aschieri; M Piepoli
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1999-02-28       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  The azimilide post-infarct survival evaluation (ALIVE) trial.

Authors:  A J Camm; R Karam; C M Pratt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-03-19       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  V Fuster; L E Rydén; R W Asinger; D S Cannom; H J Crijns; R L Frye; J L Halperin; G N Kay; W W Klein; S Lévy; R L McNamara; E N Prystowsky; L S Wann; D G Wyse; R J Gibbons; E M Antman; J S Alpert; D P Faxon; V Fuster; G Gregoratos; L F Hiratzka; A K Jacobs; R O Russell; S C Smith; W W Klein; A Alonso-Garcia; C Blomström-Lundqvist; G De Backer; M Flather; J Hradec; A Oto; A Parkhomenko; S Silber; A Torbicki
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Cairns; S J Connolly; R Roberts; M Gent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  A decade of clinical trial developments in postmyocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia patients: from CAST to AVID and beyond. Cardiac Arrhythmic Suppression Trial. Antiarrhythmic Versus Implantable Defibrillators.

Authors:  G V Naccarelli; D L Wolbrette; J T Dell'Orfano; H M Patel; J C Luck
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-08

9.  Propafenone versus sotalol for suppression of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S C Reimold; C O Cantillon; P L Friedman; E M Antman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Randomised trial of low-dose amiodarone in severe congestive heart failure. Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina (GESICA)

Authors:  H C Doval; D R Nul; H O Grancelli; S V Perrone; G R Bortman; R Curiel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-08-20       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety in pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matching to compare amiodarone vs class IC antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  Antonio Bonora; Gianni Turcato; Elena Franchi; Gabriele Taioli; Alice Dilda; Germana Zerman; Antonio Maccagnani; Claudio Pistorelli; Oliviero Olivieri
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Cell-specific nanoplatform-enabled photodynamic therapy for cardiac cells.

Authors:  Uma Mahesh R Avula; Gwangseong Kim; Yong-Eun Koo Lee; Fred Morady; Raoul Kopelman; Jérôme Kalifa
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 6.343

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.