Literature DB >> 9536367

Examining edge- and region-based texture analysis mechanisms.

S S Wolfson1, M S Landy.   

Abstract

Instantaneous texture discrimination performance was examined for different texture stimuli to uncover the use of edge-based and region-based texture analysis mechanisms. Textures were composed of randomly placed, short, oriented line segments. Line segment orientation was chosen randomly using a Gaussian distribution (described by a mean and a standard deviation). One such distribution determined the orientations on the left side of the image, and a second distribution was used for the right side. The two textures either abutted to form an edge or were separated by a blank region. A texture difference in mean orientation led to superior discrimination performance when the textures abutted. On the other hand, when the textures differed in the standard deviation of the orientation distribution, performance was similar in the two conditions. These results suggest that edge-based texture analysis mechanisms were used (i.e. were the most sensitive) in the abutting difference-in-mean case, but region-based texture analysis mechanisms were used in the other three cases.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536367     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00153-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Surface segregation driven by orientation-defined junctions.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual estimation under risk.

Authors:  Michael S Landy; Ross Goutcher; Julia Trommershäuser; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Marisa Carrasco; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Figure-Ground Modulation in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Is Distinguishable from Top-Down Attention.

Authors:  Sonia Poltoratski; Alexander Maier; Allen T Newton; Frank Tong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A perceptual space of local image statistics.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Daniel J Thengone; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perception of second- and third-order orientation signals and their interactions.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Daniel J Thengone; Mary M Conte
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Sensitivity and configuration-specificity of orientation-defined texture processing in infants and adults.

Authors:  Francesca Pei; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Image segmentation driven by elements of form.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Syed M Rizvi; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Luminance texture boundaries and luminance step boundaries are segmented using different mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.