Literature DB >> 9536349

Absorption of white light in photoreceptors.

E J Warrant1, D E Nilsson.   

Abstract

The fraction F of incident light absorbed by a photoreceptor of length l has traditionally been given by F = 1 - e-kl, where k is the absorption coefficient of the photoreceptor. Unfortunately, this widely-used expression is incorrect for absorption of the type of light most common in natural scenes--broad spectrum "white" light--and significantly over-estimates absorption. This is because the measured values of k are only valid at the absorbance peak wavelength of rhodopsin, whereas at other wavelengths (which the eye may also see) k is lower. We have accounted for the wavelength dependence of k and calculated the absorption of white light from four different natural radiant sources: the quantal irradiances of natural daylight and a patch of very blue sky, and the quantal reflections of soil and green foliage irradiated by natural daylight. Based on these results, a simple averaged correction for white light stimulation is derived, F = kl/(2.3 + kl), which is valid for a wide range of k and l, and therefore applicable to both vertebrate and invertebrate photoreceptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536349     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00151-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  48 in total

1.  Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. II. Dependence on facet lens F-number and rhabdomere type in Drosophila.

Authors:  D G Stavenga
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. III. Dependence on the pupil mechanism in the blowfly Calliphora.

Authors:  D G Stavenga
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth.

Authors:  Eric Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Retinal synaptic pathways underlying the response of the rabbit local edge detector.

Authors:  Thomas L Russell; Frank S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Luminance-dependence of spatial vision in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Bourke's parrots (Neopsephotus bourkii).

Authors:  Olle Lind; Tony Sunesson; Mindaugas Mitkus; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Bumblebee visual allometry results in locally improved resolution and globally improved sensitivity.

Authors:  Gavin J Taylor; Pierre Tichit; Marie D Schmidt; Andrew J Bodey; Christoph Rau; Emily Baird
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Temperature effects on low-light vision in juvenile rockfish (genus Sebastes) and consequences for habitat utilization.

Authors:  C R L Reilly; S H Thompson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Small fruit flies sacrifice temporal acuity to maintain contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  John P Currea; Joshua L Smith; Jamie C Theobald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The optical sensitivity of compound eyes: theory and experiment compared.

Authors:  Rikard Frederiksen; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Visual pigment in the lens eyes of the box jellyfish Chiropsella bronzie.

Authors:  Megan O'Connor; Anders Garm; Justin N Marshall; Nathan S Hart; Peter Ekström; Charlotta Skogh; Dan-Eric Nilsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.