Literature DB >> 12664095

Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. II. Dependence on facet lens F-number and rhabdomere type in Drosophila.

D G Stavenga1.   

Abstract

A wave-optical model for the integrated facet lens-rhabdomere system of fly eyes is used to calculate the effective light power in the rhabdomeres when the eye is illuminated with a point light source or with an extended source. Two rhabdomere types are considered: the slender rhabdomeres of R7,8 photoreceptors and the wider, but tapering R1-6 rhabdomeres. The angular sensitivities of the two rhabdomere types have been calculated as a function of F-number and wavelength by fitting Gaussian functions to the effective light power. For a given F-number, the angular sensitivity broadens with wavelength for the slender rhabdomeres, but it stays approximately constant for the wider rhabdomeres. The integrated effective light power increases with the rhabdomere diameter, but it is for both rhabdomere types nearly independent of the light wavelength and F-number. The results are used to interpret the small F-number of Drosophila facet lenses. Presumably the small head puts a limit to the size of the facet lens and favors a short focal length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12664095     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0390-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  17 in total

1.  On optical crosstalk between fly rhabdomeres.

Authors:  W Wijngaard; D G Stavenga
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. I. Integrated facet lens and rhabdomere optics.

Authors:  D G Stavenga
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Absorption of white light in photoreceptors.

Authors:  E J Warrant; D E Nilsson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dioptrics of the facet lenses of male blowflies Calliphora and Chrysomyia.

Authors:  D G Stavenga; R Kruizinga; H L Leertouwer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  [In vivo optical study of photoreceptor elements in the compound eye of Drosophila].

Authors:  N Franceschini; K Kirschfeld
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1971-01

6.  On the fine structure of the peripheral retina and lamina ganglionaris of the fly, Musca domestica.

Authors:  C B Boschek
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1971

Review 7.  Simple exponential functions describing the absorbance bands of visual pigment spectra.

Authors:  D G Stavenga; R P Smits; B J Hoenders
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Refractive index of the fly rhabdomere.

Authors:  D G Beersma; B J Hoenders; A M Huiser; P van Toorn
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1982-05

9.  Photoreceptor optics I: introduction to formalism and excitation in a lens-photoreceptor system.

Authors:  C Pask; K F Barrell
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  [Optomoter studies of the visual system of several eye mutants of the fruit fly Drosophila].

Authors:  K G Götz
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1964-06
View more
  37 in total

1.  Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. III. Dependence on the pupil mechanism in the blowfly Calliphora.

Authors:  D G Stavenga
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth.

Authors:  Eric Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  An exceptionally well-preserved Eocene dolichopodid fly eye: function and evolutionary significance.

Authors:  Gengo Tanaka; Andrew R Parker; David J Siveter; Haruyoshi Maeda; Masumi Furutani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Asymmetric ON-OFF processing of visual motion cancels variability induced by the structure of natural scenes.

Authors:  James E Fitzgerald; Damon A Clark; Juyue Chen; Holly B Mandel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The optical sensitivity of compound eyes: theory and experiment compared.

Authors:  Rikard Frederiksen; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Compound eyes and retinal information processing in miniature dipteran species match their specific ecological demands.

Authors:  Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido; Trevor J Wardill; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Systematic variations in microvilli banding patterns along fiddler crab rhabdoms.

Authors:  Ali Alkaladi; Martin J How; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Motion processing streams in Drosophila are behaviorally specialized.

Authors:  Alexander Y Katsov; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  One rhodopsin per photoreceptor: Iro-C genes break the rule.

Authors:  Doekele G Stavenga; Kentaro Arikawa
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Network adaptation improves temporal representation of naturalistic stimuli in Drosophila eye: I dynamics.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Anton Nikolaev; Trevor J Wardill; Cahir J O'Kane; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.