Literature DB >> 9536340

Overdiagnosis of TIA and minor stroke: experience at a regional neurovascular clinic.

P J Martin1, G Young, T P Enevoldson, P R Humphrey.   

Abstract

We compared the referral diagnoses of TIAs and minor strokes made by non-specialists with those of two consultant neurologists, in 565 consecutive cerebrovascular clinic patients, of whom 508 (90%) were referred with a diagnosis of any TIA or stroke. In 373 (73%), the neurologists felt the diagnosis of a cerebrovascular event to be correct. Agreement with the vascular syndrome (CVA vs. TIA) was significantly higher for patients with a referral diagnosis of stroke (136/176) (77%) than it was for patients with a referral diagnosis of TIA (200/332) (60%) (difference in proportions 17%, 95% CI 9-25). In 37 patients (7%) the neurologists confirmed the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease but not the specific TIA/stroke diagnosis. Vascular surgeons were more likely to be correct in their referral diagnosis of carotid territory cerebrovascular disease (88% correct) than all other sources combined (63% correct) (difference in proportions 25%, 95% CI 11-39), but there was no significant variation in diagnostic accuracy between other individual groups. In 135/508 patients (27%) referred as any TIA or stroke, the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease was undone. Alternative diagnoses included migraine (3%), epilepsy (1%), hyperventilation (1%), multiple sclerosis (1%) and a case of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, but many symptoms (8%) were unclassifiable. A strict comparison of diagnostic accuracy would have required assessment of patients not referred for specialist opinion, to estimate false-negative as well as false-positive diagnoses. However, in this patient group (which reflects current local practice) TIAs and strokes seem overdiagnosed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9536340     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/90.12.759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  8 in total

1.  Identification of stroke in the community: a comparison of three methods.

Authors:  J Mant; R J McManus; R Hare; P Mayer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement in Suspected TIA.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Lee; Kah Long Aw; Ferghal McVerry; Mark O McCarron
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-02

3.  Transient neurological symptoms in the older population: report of a prospective cohort study--the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (CFAS).

Authors:  Nahal Mavaddat; George M Savva; Daniel S Lasserson; Matthew F Giles; Carol Brayne; Jonathan Mant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons.

Authors:  V Nadarajan; R J Perry; J Johnson; D J Werring
Journal:  Pract Neurol       Date:  2014-02

5.  Diagnosis of TIA (DOT) score--design and validation of a new clinical diagnostic tool for transient ischaemic attack.

Authors:  Dipankar Dutta
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  How do neurologists diagnose transient ischemic attack: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tess Fitzpatrick; Sophia Gocan; Chu Q Wang; Candyce Hamel; Aline Bourgoin; Dar Dowlatshahi; Grant Stotts; Michel Shamy
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.266

7.  From Inpatient to Ambulatory Care: The Introduction of a Rapid Access Transient Ischaemic Attack Service.

Authors:  Mohana Maddula; Laura Adams; Jonathan Donnelly
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 8.  Predictive values of referrals for transient ischaemic attack from first-contact health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Kandiyali; Daniel S Lasserson; Penny Whiting; Alison Richards; Jonathan Mant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.