Literature DB >> 6854417

Anatomy of the healthy worker effect: a critical review.

C P Wen, S P Tsai, R L Gibson.   

Abstract

The healthy worker effect is the composite result from factors such as (1) selection of the work force, (2) changes in lifestyle accompanying employment, and (3) methodological characteristics of the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). While the choice of the general population as the comparison population is the underlying reason for this effect, no more feasible, widely accepted or "better" alternative is yet available. Much of the current understanding of the healthy worker effect has been limited to an examination of selection of the work force. The purpose of this report is to illustrate, using examples from a large cohort study, the importance of many factors other than selection. They include employment-associated benefits such as economic gain, medical insurance and lifestyle changes, the proportion of active workers, the calculation method, data completeness, length of follow-up and certain characteristics of SMR methodology. It is shown that some of the healthy worker effect is characteristic of SMR methodology and that the strength of the healthy worker effect depends on the proportion of active workers in the cohort. Furthermore, the disappearance of the healthy worker effect may be due to factors such as aging of the cohort and can be totally unrelated to the true increase in the mortality risk. In other words, its disappearance, in many instances, may be an artifact of SMR methodology.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6854417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  30 in total

Review 1.  Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Glenn S Pransky; Barbara S Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

2.  The healthy worker effect and nuclear industry workers.

Authors:  Krzysztof W Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Circadian disruption, sleep loss, and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Lara G Sigurdardottir; Unnur A Valdimarsdottir; Katja Fall; Jennifer R Rider; Steven W Lockley; Eva Schernhammer; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Physical workload and the aging worker: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B C de Zwart; M H Frings-Dresen; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Mortality study of fertiliser manufacturers in Iceland.

Authors:  V Rafnsson; H Gunnarsdóttir
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1990-11

6.  Vibrotactile sense and hand symptoms in blue collar workers in a manufacturing industry.

Authors:  B T Flodmark; G Lundborg
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Mortality study of employees with potential exposure to epichlorohydrin: a 10 year update.

Authors:  S P Tsai; E L Gilstrap; C E Ross
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Occupational exposure to ionising radiation and mortality among workers of the former Spanish Nuclear Energy Board.

Authors:  F Rodríguez Artalejo; S Castaño Lara; B de Andrés Manzano; M García Ferruelo; L Iglesias Martín; J R Calero
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  A mortality and morbidity study of refinery and petrochemical employees in Louisiana.

Authors:  S P Tsai; J K Wendt; K M Cardarelli; A E Fraser
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Implications of posttraumatic stress among military-affiliated and civilian students.

Authors:  Adam E Barry; Shawn D Whiteman; Shelley M MacDermid Wadsworth
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.