Literature DB >> 9535955

Noise-induced tuning curve changes in mechanoreceptors.

C Ivey1, A V Apkarian, D R Chialvo.   

Abstract

Fibers from the tibial nerve of rat were isolated and spike activity recorded using monopolar hook electrodes. The receptive field (RF) of each recorded unit on the glabrous skin of the foot was mechanically stimulated with waveforms comprised of various frequency sine waves in addition to increasing levels of white noise. Single-unit responses were recorded for both rapidly adapting (RA) and slowly adapting (SA) units. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the output was quantified by the correlation coefficient (C1) between the input sine wave and the nerve responses. The addition of noise enhanced signal transmission in both RA and SA fibers. With increasing noise, the initially inverted "V"-shaped, zero-noise tuning curves for RA fibers broadened and eventually inverted. There was a large expansion of the frequencies that the RA receptor responded to with increasing noise input. On the other hand, the typical shape of the SA fiber tuning curves remained invariant, at all noise levels tested. C1 values continued to increase with larger noise input for higher frequencies, but did not do so at the lowest frequencies. For both RA and SA fibers the responses with added noise tended to be rate modulated at the low-frequency end, and followed nonlinear stochastic resonance (SR) properties at the higher frequencies. The changes in the tuning properties due to noise found here, as well as preliminary psychophysics data, imply that external noise is relevant for sensing small periodic signals in the environment. All current models of sensory perception assume that the tuning properties of receptors determined in the absence of noise are preserved during everyday tasks. Our results indicate that this is not true in a noisy environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9535955     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Do neocortical pyramidal neurons display stochastic resonance?

Authors:  M Rudolph; A Destexhe
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Stochastic resonance within the somatosensory system: effects of noise on evoked field potentials elicited by tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Elías Manjarrez; Gerardo Rojas-Piloni; Ignacio Méndez; Amira Flores
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Noise-enhanced kinaesthesia: a psychophysical and microneurographic study.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Marc Aimonetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Improving balance function using vestibular stochastic resonance: optimizing stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Matthew J Fiedler; Igor S Kofman; Scott J Wood; Jorge M Serrador; Brian Peters; Helen S Cohen; Millard F Reschke; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Improved detection of magnetic signals by a MEMS sensor using stochastic resonance.

Authors:  Agustín L Herrera-May; Jesus A Tapia; Saúl M Domínguez-Nicolás; Raul Juarez-Aguirre; Edmundo A Gutierrez-D; Amira Flores; Eduard Figueras; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Ocular Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials to Bone-Conducted Vibration.

Authors:  Shinichi Iwasaki; Shotaro Karino; Teru Kamogashira; Fumiharu Togo; Chisato Fujimoto; Yoshiharu Yamamoto; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Stochastic resonance improves visuomotor temporal integration in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Michihiro Osumi; Atsushi Matsuo; Takahiro Fukuchi; Akio Nakai; Takuro Zama; Sotaro Shimada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ubiquitous crossmodal Stochastic Resonance in humans: auditory noise facilitates tactile, visual and proprioceptive sensations.

Authors:  Eduardo Lugo; Rafael Doti; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Using low levels of stochastic vestibular stimulation to improve locomotor stability.

Authors:  Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Igor S Kofman; Yiri E De Dios; Chris Miller; Brian T Peters; Rahul Goel; Raquel Galvan-Garza; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.