Literature DB >> 9535520

Effects of alignment changes on stance phase pressures and shear stresses on transtibial amputees: measurements from 13 transducer sites.

J E Sanders1, D M Bell, R M Okumura, A J Dralle.   

Abstract

Interface pressures and shear stresses were measured at 13 sites on two unilateral below-knee amputee subjects ambulating with lower-limb patellar-tendon-bearing prostheses. Interface stresses at the time of the first peak in the shank axial force-time curve were investigated at different socket-shank alignment settings. Stress magnitudes ranged from 1.2 to 214.7 kPa for pressure and 0.4 to 79.6 kPa for resultant shear stress, and changes in stress due to misalignment ranged from 1.3 to 80.7 kPa for pressure and from 0.2 to 38.0 kPa for resultant shear stress. For both subjects interface stress changes were much greater in the anterior socket region than in the lateral or posterior regions. Thus, alignment changes had a localized effect on interface stresses. Plots of alignment versus pressure or resultant shear stress were nonlinear for both subjects, in a number of cases maximizing or minimizing at the nominal alignment, indicating complex interface stress-alignment relationships. Variation (standard deviation/mean) was not significantly different for nominal versus misaligned steps, indicating that the subjects adapted well to the alignment changes. Session to session differences in interface stresses were typically larger than interface stress differences induced by alignment modifications. Thus, while these subjects compensated well for alignment changes to maintain consistent interface stresses within a session, they did not do so for different sessions conducted weeks apart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9535520     DOI: 10.1109/86.662617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1063-6528


  5 in total

1.  Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface.

Authors:  Eric C Swanson; Jake B McLean; Katheryn J Allyn; Christian B Redd; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Effect of alignment changes on socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet.

Authors:  Toshiki Kobayashi; Adam K Arabian; Michael S Orendurff; Teri G Rosenbaum-Chou; David A Boone
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Effects of physical exertion on trans-tibial prosthesis users' ability to accommodate alignment perturbations.

Authors:  Goeran Fiedler; Brooke A Slavens; Kristian M O'Connor; Roger O Smith; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Clinical implication of interface pressure for a new prosthetic suspension system.

Authors:  Hossein Gholizadeh; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Arezoo Eshraghi; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Systematic Review of Studies Examining Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Pressures with Changes in Device Alignment.

Authors:  Philip Davenport; Siamak Noroozi; Philip Sewell; Saeed Zahedi
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 1.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.