Literature DB >> 9534732

Bone densitometry: current status and future prospects.

G M Blake1, C C Glüer, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, growing awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population and the consequent costs of healthcare have stimulated development of new treatments to prevent fractures, together with new imaging technologies to assist in diagnosis. With its ability to perform high-precision measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and hip, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is well suited to meet this latter need. However, there is continuing interest in smaller, less expensive, systems for assessing the peripheral skeleton. These include peripheral DXA scanning of the distal forearm and a variety of devices for performing quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) in bone. Pivotal to all these developments is the demonstration in prospective studies that new technologies can reliably identify patients at risk of osteoporotic fractures. Whether DXA technology can meet the anticipated need for wider provision of diagnostic services is uncertain at present. The likely alternative is bone ultrasound. Although QUS technology is substantially cheaper than DXA and has proved its ability to predict fracture risk in the elderly, it is less precise, there is a lack of appropriate phantoms for quality control and there are doubts about how to interpret results in younger women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9534732     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.1997.0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis and bone densitometry: does the emperor have clothes?

Authors:  B C Lentle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Determination of a standard site for the measurement of bone mineral density of the human calcaneus.

Authors:  B Burston; D S McNally; H D Nicholson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sheng-Dan Jiang; Li-Yang Dai; Lei-Sheng Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  An approach to the patient with osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Mumtaz
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2001-01

5.  Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; W J McIsaac; G Hawker; L Jaakkimainen; S M Cadarette; B T Chan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The Lichfield bone study: the skeletal response to exercise in healthy young men.

Authors:  Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; Jaikirty S Rawal; Anthony Kehoe; Laurence E James; John R Payne; James R Skipworth; Zudin A Puthucheary; Fotios Drenos; Dudley J Pennell; Mike Loosemore; Michael World; Steve E Humphries; Fares S Haddad; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-11-23

7.  Relationship between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in young healthy men.

Authors:  J Rawal; K Eleftheriou; J Skipworth; Z Puthucheary; M Loosemore; J Payne; F Dreno; M World; F Haddad; S Humphries; H Montgomery
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.