Literature DB >> 9533194

Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis.

P Verhaeghen1, L De Meersman.   

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, data from 20 studies comparing younger and older adults on the Stroop interference effect, contained in 15 articles, were analyzed. No significant difference was found in the Stroop interference effect, expressed as mean standardized difference, between the 2 age groups (for younger adults: d = 2.04; for older adults: d = 2.17). Moderator variables were present, but these did not produce age differences. Brinley analysis showed that a single regression line with a slowing factor of 1.9 described the data well (R2 = .83) and confirmed that no Age x Condition interaction was present in the data. Likewise, no Age x Condition interaction was found when the data were fitted to the information loss model; the age ratio of decay rates was estimated to be 1.4. Consequently, the apparent age-sensitivity of the Stroop interference effect appears to be merely an artifact of general slowing.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9533194     DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.1.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  40 in total

1.  LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context.

Authors:  Loan C Vuong; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Age preservation of the syntactic processor in production.

Authors:  Douglas J Davidson; Rose T Zacks; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-09

3.  Analysis of group differences in processing speed: Brinley plots, Q-Q plots, and other conspiracies.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; David R Adams; Sandra Hale; Lisa Jenkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  Both left and right posterior parietal activations contribute to compensatory processes in normal aging.

Authors:  Chih-Mao Huang; Thad A Polk; Joshua O Goh; Denise C Park
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Neural correlates of conflict processing.

Authors:  Robert West; Kristin Jakubek; Nicholas Wymbs; Michele Perry; Kara Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Stroop interference, practice, and aging.

Authors:  Douglas J Davidson; Rose T Zacks; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2003-06

7.  Age deficits in the control of prepotent responses: evidence for an inhibitory decline.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Rose T Zacks
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-09

8.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

9.  Age-related increases in Stroop interference: delineation of general slowing based on behavioral and white matter analyses.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Lisa Zschutschke; Armin Scheurich; Florian Schmitz; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.

Authors:  Matthew C Davidson; Dima Amso; Loren Cruess Anderson; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.