Literature DB >> 9533140

Limitations of clinical CT in assessing cortical thickness and density.

D L Newman1, G Dougherty, A al Obaid, H al Hajrasy.   

Abstract

The peak CT number (CT) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) were obtained from the image profiles of aluminium of thickness ranging from 0.1-9.5 mm. The scans were performed at different fields of view (FOVs) and with different reconstruction algorithms ('bone' and 'standard'). Above 3 mm, CT and FWHM provide measures of the density and thickness which are largely independent of FOV (i.e. pixel size) and algorithm. Below 3 mm, CT falls progressively whilst FWHM remains relatively constant. At these small thicknesses the effect of FOV on CT is more pronounced when the bone algorithm is used, whilst FWHM remains relatively constant and independent of both FOV and algorithm. The results are discussed in terms of thickness relative to pixel size and spatial resolution as characterized by the point spread function. A linear relationship was found between the product CT x FWHM and thickness that is independent of both FOV and algorithm. This product may be useful in studies of cortical bone and changes due to osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9533140     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/3/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Three-dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using Laplace's equation.

Authors:  S E Jones; B R Buchbinder; I Aharon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  High speed insertion of bone fracture fixation pins: a finite element penetration model with experimental comparisons.

Authors:  Matthew P Prygoski; Timotius Pasang; Steven R Schmid; Antony J Lozier
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Accuracy and reliability of length measurements on three-dimensional computed tomography using open-source OsiriX software.

Authors:  Gihyeon Kim; Ho-Joong Jung; Han-Jun Lee; Jae-Sung Lee; Seungbum Koo; Seung-Hwan Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Iliac cortical thickness in the neonate - the gradient effect.

Authors:  Craig A Cunningham; Sue M Black
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Multi-resolutional shape features via non-Euclidean wavelets: applications to statistical analysis of cortical thickness.

Authors:  Won Hwa Kim; Vikas Singh; Moo K Chung; Chris Hinrichs; Deepti Pachauri; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Estimation of skull table thickness with clinical CT and validation with microCT.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Lillie; Jillian E Urban; Ashley A Weaver; Alexander K Powers; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Brett Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data.

Authors:  G M Treece; A H Gee; P M Mayhew; K E S Poole
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Wahyu Setia Budi; Freddy Haryanto; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.