Literature DB >> 9530887

Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy.

T A Brown1, J W Wall, E D Christensen, D V Smith, C A Holt, P L Carter, T H Patience, S S Babu, W C Williard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To characterize both atypical hyperplasia (AH) and the malignancies typically present at open surgical biopsy in women diagnosed with AH by stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB).
METHODS: Patients with AH diagnosed by SCNB were advised to undergo surgical biopsy to rule out an associated malignancy. Mammography findings, pathology reports and follow-up data were analyzed.
RESULTS: AH was identified by SCNB in 38 of 893 (4.3%) patients. Carcinoma was identified in 12 of 33 (36.4%) patients who went on to surgical biopsy. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was present in 11 of the 12 patients with malignancy. There were no characteristic mammographic findings which would identify patients with carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: When SCNB returns a diagnosis of AH there is a substantial risk of an associated malignancy in the breast. There appear to be no definitive criteria to distinguish which patients harbor a malignancy, and surgical biopsy should always serve as an adjunct diagnostic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530887     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199803)67:3<168::aid-jso5>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  8 in total

1.  Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate?

Authors:  P J Carder; J C Liston
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease.

Authors:  Hai-Lin Park; Lee Su Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

3.  Vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy for isolated BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications: evaluation with histopathology and midterm follow-up results.

Authors:  Mehmet Mahir Atasoy; Nuri Tasali; Rahmi Çubuk; Burcu Narin; Uğur Deveci; Neşe Yener; Levent Çelik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Byung Joo Chae; Ahwon Lee; Byung Joo Song; Sang Seol Jung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Underestimation of cancer in case of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by vacuum assisted core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Karol Polom; Dawid Murawa; Paweł Kurzawa; Michał Michalak; Paweł Murawa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-04-10

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M Verkooijen; P H Peeters; E Buskens; V C Koot; I H Borel Rinkes; W P Mali; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Discussion of Histopathological Findings of 954 Breast Reduction Specimens.

Authors:  Soysal Bas; Cagatay Oner; Ali Can Aydin; Ramazan Ucak; Selami Serhat Sirvan; Semra Karsidag
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-03-17

8.  The ratio of atypical ductal hyperplasia foci to core numbers in needle biopsy: a practical index predicting breast cancer in subsequent excision.

Authors:  Jeong-Ju Lee; Hee Jin Lee; Jun Kang; Jeong-Hyeon Jo; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  Korean J Pathol       Date:  2012-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.