Literature DB >> 9530535

The application of adverse drug reaction data to drug choice decisions made by pharmacy and therapeutics committees. An Australian perspective.

L M Weekes1, R O Day.   

Abstract

Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) committees undertake policy, regulatory and educational activities to promote rational use of medicines in their institutions with the aim of improving the quality of health and economic outcomes at these institutions. Formulary management is an important part of the P&T committees' activities and making drug choices is one of the committees' most difficult tasks. The 3 types of information most commonly identified by P&T committees as necessary for making drug choices are effectiveness, safety and cost data; usually in this order of importance. There is some evidence, however, that safety data are not considered by all committees when they make decisions about adding a new drug to a formulary. The role of adverse drug reaction (ADR) data in formulary decision-making (for registered drugs) occurs at several levels. First, ADR data obtained from pre-marketing studies of the drug are important and enable the committee to make an assessment of the risk of toxicity that should be anticipated for the drug. However, the limited nature of this information makes an absolute assessment impossible. Secondly, comparative safety information is necessary when deciding the place in therapy of a particular drug. Weighing up the comparative risks and benefits is a complex task which is a routine activity for most P&T committees whatever level of sophistication is applied. Thirdly, ADR data are an important ingredient of any economic assessment considered by a P&T committee. Calculation of the costs and consequences associated with the adverse effects of treatment demand careful assessment. Finally, aggregated adverse drug event reports which collate not only the consequences of adverse drug reactions but also medication incidents (medication errors) and which have been reported locally can be a useful quality assurance process for a P&T committee. This information will contribute to the identification of drugs for deletion from the formulary and less commonly in making decisions about additions to the formulary. As formulary management forms only part of a P&T committee's work, so the committee's interest in ADR is broader than the use of these data in making drug choices. The P&T committee may also be involved in promoting ADR reporting to either a central database or primary carers. Although often of limited availability, ADR information has an important role in the formulary management process of P&T committees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530535     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199818030-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  15 in total

1.  Application of decision analysis to drug selection for formulary addition.

Authors:  J J Kresel; H C Hutchings; D N MacKay; M C Weinstein; J L Read; K Taylor-Halvorsen; H Ashley
Journal:  Hosp Formul       Date:  1987-07

2.  Drug formularies provide a path to best care.

Authors:  F R Curtiss
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Indicators for drug and therapeutics committees.

Authors:  L M Weekes; C Brooks; R O Day
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Drug and Therapeutics Committees in Australia: expected and actual performance.

Authors:  L M Weekes; C Brooks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities. Drug Committee of the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

Authors:  F Bochner; E D Martin; N G Burgess; A A Somogyi; G M Misan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-02

6.  A multiattribute-utility-function approach to weighing the risks and benefits of pharmaceutical agents.

Authors:  S Eriksen; L R Keller
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A social scientific view on the development of pharmacy and therapeutics committees.

Authors:  H H Henriksen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Reporting of adverse events in hospitals in Victoria, 1994-1995.

Authors:  D A O'Hara; N J Carson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1997-05-05       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Multiattribute evaluation in formulary decision making as applied to calcium-channel blockers.

Authors:  G E Schumacher
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1991-02

Review 10.  Quality control of drug prescriptions by positive lists--the European Formulary.

Authors:  G Glaeske
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.366

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prioritising drug and therapeutics committee (DTC) decisions: a national survey.

Authors:  Ee Lyn Tan; Richard O Day; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-12-23

2.  Drug and therapeutics committees in Jordanian hospitals: a nation-wide survey of organization, activities, and drug selection procedures.

Authors:  Qais Alefan; Somayya Alshareef; Samah Al-Shatnawi
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2019-11-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.