Literature DB >> 9529909

The mean-integral representation of rectangles.

N A Macmillan1, A S Ornstein.   

Abstract

To assess perceptual interaction between the height and width of rectangles, we used an accuracy variant of the Garner paradigm. We measured the discriminability of height and width (baseline tasks) and size and shape (correlated tasks). From the d' values in these conditions, we estimated perceptual distances and inferred a mean-integral representation in which height and width corresponded to non-independent dimensions in a perceptual space. This model accounted well for performance in these two-stimulus conditions, and it also explained 70%-80% of the decline in performance in selective and divided attention. In a second experiment, conducted for purposes of comparison with the rectangle discrimination Experiment, we studied the discrimination of horizontal and vertical line segments connected in an L-shape. In size discrimination, observers were equally good with line pairs and rectangles, suggesting holistic perception; but in shape discrimination, they appeared to combine information from the two line-pair components of the rectangle independently. The mean-integral model was again successful in relating performance in the Garner tasks quantitatively.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529909     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  5 in total

1.  Strong Bias Towards Analytic Perception in ASD Does not Necessarily Come at the Price of Impaired Integration Skills.

Authors:  Bat-Sheva Hadad; Yair Ziv
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-06

2.  Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding.

Authors:  Dongbin Tobin Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-10-26

3.  REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Katherine Heller; Joseph L Austerweil; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  PowerPoint(®) Presentation Flaws and Failures: A Psychological Analysis.

Authors:  Stephen M Kosslyn; Rogier A Kievit; Alexandra G Russell; Jennifer M Shephard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-17

5.  Technical clarification to Silbert and Thomas (2013): "decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory framework".

Authors:  Robin D Thomas; Noah H Silbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.