Literature DB >> 9529902

Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals.

A M Bonnel1, E R Hafter.   

Abstract

Past studies of simultaneous attention to pairs of visual stimuli have used the "dual-task" paradigm to show that identification of the direction of a change in luminance, whether incremental or decremental, is "capacity-limited," while simple detection of these changes is governed by "capacity-free" processes. On the basis of that finding, it has been suggested that the contrast between identification and detection reflects different processes in the sensory periphery, namely the responses of magno- and parvocellular receptors. The present study questions that assertion and investigates the contribution of central processing in resource limitation by applying the dual task to a situation in which one stimulus is auditory and one is visual. The results are much the same as before, with identification demonstrating the tradeoff in performance generally attributed to a limited capacity but detection showing no loss compared with single-task controls. This implies that limitations on resources operate at a central level of processing rather than in the auditory and visual peripheries.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529902     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  26 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Principles of cross-modal competition: evidence from deficits of attention.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Sharma K Hendel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Separate attentional resources for vision and audition.

Authors:  David Alais; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Perceiving sequential dependencies in auditory streams.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Eric R Thompson; Virginia Best; Gregory H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Amanda L Parker; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Relative effects of increment and pedestal duration on the detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dividing attention between two transparent motion surfaces results in a failure of selective attention.

Authors:  Zachary Raymond Ernst; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The relationship between auditory processing and restricted, repetitive behaviors in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Niko Kargas; Beatriz López; Vasudevi Reddy; Paul Morris
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-03

9.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

10.  The role of judgment frames and task precision in object attention: Reduced template sharpness limits dual-object performance.

Authors:  Shiau-Hua Liu; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.