Literature DB >> 9529342

Determinism and mass-media portrayals of genetics.

C M Condit1, N Ofulue, K M Sheedy.   

Abstract

Scholars have expressed concern that the introduction of substantial coverage of "medical genetics" in the mass media during the past 2 decades represents an increase in biological determinism in public discourse. To test this contention, we analyzed the contents of a randomly selected, structured sample of American public newspapers (n=250) and magazines (n=722) published during 1919-95. Three coders, using three measures, all with intercoder reliability >85%, were employed. Results indicate that the introduction of the discourse of medical genetics is correlated with both a statistically significant decrease in the degree to which articles attribute human characteristics to genetic causes (P<.001) and a statistically significant increase in the differentiation of attributions to genetic and other causes among various conditions or outcomes (P<. 016). There has been no statistically significant change in the relative proportions of physical phenomena attributed to genetic causes, but there has been a statistically significant decrease in the number of articles assigning genetic causes to mental (P<.002) and behavioral (P<.000) characteristics. These results suggest that the current discourse of medical genetics is not accurately described as more biologically deterministic than its antecedents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529342      PMCID: PMC1377024          DOI: 10.1086/301784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  21 in total

Review 1.  Ethical boundary work: geneticization, philosophy and the social sciences.

Authors:  A M Hedgecoe
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

2.  Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers.

Authors:  Tania M Bubela; Timothy A Caulfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Science reporting to the public: does the message get twisted?

Authors:  Celeste Condit
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Genetic tools, Kuhnean theoretical shift and the geneticization process.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Torres
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Interacting and paradoxical forces in neuroscience and society.

Authors:  Jennifer Singh; Joachim Hallmayer; Judy Illes
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Gene concepts and genethics: beyond exceptionalism.

Authors:  Péter Kakuk
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Geneticization and bioethics: advancing debate and research.

Authors:  Vilhjálmur Arnason; Stefán Hjörleifsson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-08-18

8.  Frame that gene. A tool for analysing and classifying the communication of genetics to the public.

Authors:  Rebecca Carver; Ragnar Waldahl; Jarle Breivik
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Lost in Translation? A Comparison of Cancer-Genetics Reporting in the Press Release and its Subsequent Coverage in Lay Press.

Authors:  Jean M Brechman; Chul-Joo Lee; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Sci Commun       Date:  2009-06

10.  Distorting Genetic Research about Cancer: From Bench Science to Press Release to Published News.

Authors:  Jean M Brechman; Chul-Joo Lee; Joseph Cappella
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2011-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.