Literature DB >> 9529206

Immediate breast reconstruction for breast carcinoma using the periareolar approach.

C J Gabka1, G Maiwald, H Bohmert.   

Abstract

Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction has shown to be oncologically safe while providing dependable aesthetic results. However, flap inset into the skin defect of the excised biopsy site and nipple-areola complex often results in a patchlike effect and transverse scars. By keeping the mastectomy incision solely around the areola, all breast skin can be preserved. Thus, in immediate breast reconstruction with replacement of the nipple and areola by a small skin island from a deepithelialized TRAM flap or latissimus dorsi muscle flap, the scar is kept at the natural border between areola and breast skin. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex further helps to camouflage the incision line. This may result in the best possible aesthetic outcome after mastectomy to date. The technique has been used in 17 breast cancer patients (intraductal cancer, n = 5; T1/T2 ductal cancer, n = 13) with good to excellent results. No local or distant recurrences have been seen; however, mean follow-up time is short (10 months). As the procedure of choice, a free TRAM flap was performed in nine patients for immediate reconstruction. The other eight patients were too slim for an autologous reconstruction; therefore, a latissimus dorsi muscle flap with a small skin island and a silicone implant were used. There were no major complications in either group. In contrast to traditional skin-sparing mastectomy, all breast skin is preserved with the periareolar approach. Therefore, special surgical expertise is required to ensure tumor free margins, especially with respect to the skin overlying the tumor. If these requirements are met, excellent results in breast reconstruction are amenable with adequate oncologic safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529206     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199804050-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients undergoing skin/nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction.

Authors:  Satoru Tanaka; Takehiro Nohara; Mitsuhiko Iwamoto; Kazuhiro Sumiyoshi; Kosei Kimura; Yuko Takahashi; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction by a new modification of extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Ahmed Setit; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Nipple sparing mastectomy: does breast morphological factor related to necrotic complications?

Authors:  Prakasit Chirappapha; Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Francesca De Lorenzi; Cristina Garusi; Stefano Martella; Benedetta Barbieri; Alessandra Gottardi; Manconi Andrea; Lomeo Giuseppe; Alaa Hamza; Visnu Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-02-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.