Literature DB >> 9529204

Undermining of the scalp: quantitative effects.

E Raposio1, R E Nordström, P L Santi.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate to what extent undermining affects the closing-tension of scalp defects to quantify the surgery-related benefits provided by this procedure. Data were collected by stepwise loading in 10 patients, 20 scalp flaps (obtained by a reversed Y scalp incision), and three different degrees of subgaleal undermining (1, 5, and 15 cm). The obtained data confirmed the value of undermining to diminish the tension on wound margins when closing a scalp defect. There was a progressive decrease in tension required to advance the wound edge when the amount of undermining was sequentially increased. Most of this reduction occurred with the 5-cm undermining, although statistically the 15-cm undermining also resulted in a significant decrease in the tension required to close the defect. Mean 83.3- and 92.2-percent reductions of the closing tension were obtained with 5 cm and 15 cm of undermining, respectively, compared with that achieved by the 1-cm undermining with the same width of defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529204     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199804050-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Scalp and calvarial reconstruction.

Authors:  Samuel J Lin; Matthew M Hanasono; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Free Tissue Reconstruction of the Scalp.

Authors:  Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Emily Misch; Aurora Vincent; Weitao Wang; Sameep Kadakia; Yadranko Ducic; Jesse Smith
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Bayesian calibration of a computational model of tissue expansion based on a porcine animal model.

Authors:  Tianhong Han; Taeksang Lee; Joanna Ledwon; Elbert Vaca; Sergey Turin; Aaron Kearney; Arun K Gosain; Adrian B Tepole
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Can we put a simplified algorithm for reconstruction of large scalp defects following tumor resection?

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Ashraf Khater; Omar Farouk; Mohammad Hegazy; Mahmoud Mosbah; Mohammad Hafez; Fayez Shahatto; Sameh Roshdy; Waleed Elnahas; Mohammad Kasem
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Improving reconstructive surgery design using Gaussian process surrogates to capture material behavior uncertainty.

Authors:  Casey Stowers; Taeksang Lee; Ilias Bilionis; Arun K Gosain; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Basal Cell Carcinoma Surgery: Simple Undermining Approach in Two Patients with Different Tumour Locations.

Authors:  Georgi Tchernev; Cristiana Voicu; Mara Mihai; Mihai Lupu; Tiberiu Tebeica; Nely Koleva; Uwe Wollina; Torello Lotti; Hristo Mangarov; Ilko Bakardzhiev; Jacopo Lotti; Katlein França; Atanas Batashki; James W Patterson
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-24

7.  Scalp expansion: Surgical considerations and possible future directions.

Authors:  Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Apr

8.  Undermining during cutaneous wound closure for wounds less than 3 cm in diameter: a randomized split wound comparative effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Jayne Joo; Aunna Pourang; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; April W Armstrong; Danielle M Tartar; Thomas H King; Raja K Sivamani; Daniel B Eisen
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Personalized Computational Models of Tissue-Rearrangement in the Scalp Predict the Mechanical Stress Signature of Rotation Flaps.

Authors:  Taeksang Lee; Sergey Y Turin; Casey Stowers; Arun K Gosain; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-09-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.