Literature DB >> 9527789

Comparison of pharmacodynamics of azithromycin and erythromycin in vitro and in vivo.

J G den Hollander1, J D Knudsen, J W Mouton, K Fuursted, N Frimodt-Møller, H A Verbrugh, F Espersen.   

Abstract

In this study, we determined the efficacy of various dosing regimens for erythromycin and azithromycin against four pneumococci with different susceptibilities to penicillin in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model and in a mouse peritonitis model. The MIC was 0.03 microg/ml, and the 50% effective doses (determined after one dose) of both drugs were comparable for the four pneumococcal strains and were in the range of 1.83 to 6.22 mg/kg. Dosing experiments with mice, using regimens for azithromycin of one to eight doses/6 h, showed the one-dose regimen to give the best result; of the pharmacodynamic parameters tested (the maximum drug concentration in serum [Cmax], the times that the drug concentration in serum remained above the MIC and above the concentration required for maximum killing, and the area under the concentration time curve), Cmax was the best predictor of outcome. The bacterial counts in mouse blood or peritoneal fluid during the first 24 h after challenge were not correlated to survival of the mice. The serum concentration profiles obtained with mice for the different dosing regimens were simulated in the in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Here as well, the one-dose regimen of azithromycin showed the best result. However, the killing curves in vivo in mouse blood and peritoneal fluid and in the vitro pharmacokinetic model were not similar. The in vitro killing curves showed a decrease of 2 log10 within 2 and 3 h for azithromycin and erythromycin, respectively whereas the in vivo killing curves showed a bacteriostatic effect for both drugs. It is concluded that the results in terms of predictive pharmacodynamic parameters are comparable for the in vitro and in vivo models and that high initial concentrations of azithromycin favor a good outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9527789      PMCID: PMC105417          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.2.377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of azithromycin, roxithromycin, and cephalexin penetration kinetics in early and mature abscesses.

Authors:  D Girard; J M Bergeron; W B Milisen; J A Retsema
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  K P Klugman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Comparison of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of otitis media in children.

Authors:  R R Daniel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  A single-blind comparison of three-day azithromycin and ten-day co-amoxiclav treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  A I Hoepelman; A P Sips; J L van Helmond; P W van Barneveld; A J Neve; M Zwinkels; M Rozenberg-Arska; J Verhoef
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Preferential concentration of azithromycin in an infected mouse thigh model.

Authors:  J A Retsema; J M Bergeron; D Girard; W B Milisen; A E Girard
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerance of azithromycin, dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin in the treatment of children with acute skin and skin-structure infections.

Authors:  A Rodriguez-Solares; F Pérez-Gutiérrez; J Prosperi; E Milgram; A Martin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Prophylactic and therapeutic activities of azithromycin in a mouse model of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  E Azoulay-Dupuis; E Vallée; J P Bedos; M Muffat-Joly; J J Pocidalo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The comparative activity of azithromycin, macrolides and amoxycillin against streptococci in experimental infections.

Authors:  A E Girard; C R Cimochowski; J A Faiella
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 9.  Azithromycin and clarithromycin: overview and comparison with erythromycin.

Authors:  M S Whitman; A R Tunkel
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Comparative efficacies of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin against experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice.

Authors:  T Butler; A E Girard
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of cethromycin, a new ketolide, against Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptible or resistant to erythromycin in a murine pneumonia model.

Authors:  E Azoulay-Dupuis; J Mohler; J P Bédos; C Barau; B Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pulmonary damage and bacterial load in assessment of the efficacy of simulated human treatment-like amoxicillin (2,000 milligrams) therapy of experimental pneumococcal pneumonia caused by strains for which amoxicillin MICs differ.

Authors:  Matilde Gracia; Carmina Martínez-Marín; Lorena Huelves; Maria J Giménez; Lorenzo Aguilar; Antonio Carcas; Carmen Ponte; Francisco Soriano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamic assessment of clarithromycin in a murine model of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  Pamela R Tessier; Myo-Kyoung Kim; Wen Zhou; Dawei Xuan; Chonghua Li; Min Ye; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Efficacy of single-dose azithromycin in treatment of acute otitis media in children after a baseline tympanocentesis.

Authors:  Michael W Dunne; Chandra Khurana; Adriano Arguedas Mohs; Adib Rodriguez; Antonio Arrieta; Samuel McLinn; Judy A Krogstad; Mark Blatter; Richard Schwartz; Sergio L Vargas; Paz Emparanza; Pilar Fernandez; Willis M Gooch; Mary Aspin; John Podgore; Irmeli Roine; Jeffrey L Blumer; Garth D Ehrlich; Jean Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Intracellular activity of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse peritonitis model.

Authors:  Anne Sandberg; Jonas H R Hessler; Robert L Skov; Jens Blom; Niels Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Azithromycin blocks quorum sensing and alginate polymer formation and increases the sensitivity to serum and stationary-growth-phase killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and attenuates chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection in Cftr(-/-) mice.

Authors:  Nadine Hoffmann; Baoleri Lee; Morten Hentzer; Thomas Bovbjerg Rasmussen; Zhijun Song; Helle Krogh Johansen; Michael Givskov; Niels Høiby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Molecular Basis of Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter Strains Isolated from Poultry in South Korea.

Authors:  Bai Wei; Min Kang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Treatment of Pneumococcal Infection by Using Engineered Human C-Reactive Protein in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Donald N Ngwa; Sanjay K Singh; Toh B Gang; Alok Agrawal
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 7.561

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.