Literature DB >> 9527730

Propofol sedation and gastric emptying in volunteers.

B Hammas1, A Hvarfner, S E Thörn, M Wattwil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of light propofol sedation on gastric emptying and orocecal transit time (OCT).
METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers were studied on 2 occasions separated by at least 1 week and were randomly allocated to receive either propofol sedation or i.v. saline as a control. During propofol sedation the volunteers were sedated to grade 2-3 on a 5-grade scale. This was achieved by a propofol infusion of 5 mg kg(-1) h(-1) initially, which was then titrated down to a dose of 2.4+/-0.7 mg kg(-1) h(-1). Paracetamol absorption was used as an indirect measure of the rate of gastric emptying and OCT was determined by use of the hydrogen breath test after ingestion of raffinose. Student's t-test for paired samples was used and the results are presented as means+/-SD.
RESULTS: During propofol sedation the maximum concentration of paracetamol (Cmax) was 115+/-26.8 micromol/L, time to peak concentration (Tmax) 50+/-38.8 min, and the area under the curve during the first 60 min (AUC60) 4793+/-1538 micromol x min/L, versus Cmax 99+/-20.8, Tmax 69+/-41.9 and AUC60 3897+/-1310 during saline infusion. These differences were not statistically significant. OCT was significantly shorter during the control study, 180+/-32.4 min, than during propofol sedation, 217+/-64.9 min (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study in volunteers has shown that gastric emptying of liquids seems uninfluenced by light propofol sedation. OCT was slightly prolonged during light propofol sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9527730     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  Gastric Dysmotility in Critically Ill Children: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Enid E Martinez; Katherine Douglas; Samuel Nurko; Nilesh M Mehta
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Antro-pyloro-duodenal motor responses to gastric and duodenal nutrient in critically ill patients.

Authors:  M Chapman; R Fraser; R Vozzo; L Bryant; W Tam; N Nguyen; B Zacharakis; R Butler; G Davidson; M Horowitz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Adam Deane; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Nam Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Gastric emptying evaluation by ultrasound prior colonoscopy: an easy tool following bowel preparation.

Authors:  Romain Coriat; Vanessa Polin; Ammar Oudjit; Franck Henri; Marion Dhooge; Sarah Leblanc; Chantal Delchambre; Anouk Esch; Tessa Tabouret; Maximilien Barret; Frédéric Prat; Stanislas Chaussade
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Relationship between altered small intestinal motility and absorption after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen; Laura K Besanko; Carly M Burgstad; Jim Burnett; Brendan Stanley; Ross Butler; Richard H Holloway; Robert J L Fraser
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The effect of anesthetic technique on early postoperative gastric emptying: comparison of propofol-remifentanil and opioid-free sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Jakob Walldén; Sven-Egron Thörn; Asa Lövqvist; Lisbeth Wattwil; Magnus Wattwil
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  The effects of sedation on gastric emptying and intra-gastric meal distribution in critical illness.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Katrina Ching; Max Bellon; Richard H Holloway
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Opportunities for the replacement of animals in the study of nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  A M Holmes; J A Rudd; F D Tattersall; Q Aziz; P L R Andrews
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 8.739

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.