PURPOSE: Small intestinal (SI) motor patterns are often disrupted after major non-gastrointestinal (non-GI) surgery, but the impact on luminal flow and nutrient absorption is unclear. This study examines interactions between SI motility, flow and absorption in the first 3 days after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Concurrent assessments of SI motility (manometry), flow (impedancometry) and lipid (¹³C-triolein) and glucose [plasma 3-O-methyl-glucose (3-OMG)] absorption were performed in 13 patients (12 male; 77 ± 2 years) on days 1 and 3 post surgery during 3-h intra-duodenal nutrient infusion (Ensure® with 200 μl ¹³C-triolein, 3 g 3-OMG). Data, presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), are compared with 10 healthy volunteers (9 male; 57 ± 4 years). RESULTS: On day 1 post surgery, there were more motility bursts, fewer impedance events and reduced absorption of ¹³C-triolein [cumulative percent dose recovery (cPDR) 22.9 ± 2.4% versus 31.2 ± 4.2%; P < 0.001] and 3-OMG, compared with health. By day 3, total number of bursts and flow events were similar between groups, with fewer retrograde and more antegrade flow episodes. ¹³C-triolein absorption remained low in patients on day 3 (26.7 ± 2.2%, P < 0.05), correlating positively with total number of flow events (r = 0.49; P < 0.01), but negatively with prolonged events (r = -0.37; P = 0.03). In patients, 3-OMG absorption increased from day 1 to 3 to a level comparable to health. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst disruption in SI motility and flow (impedance) events was associated with reduced absorption of both lipid and carbohydrate, lipid malabsorption was more prolonged. This may reflect inadequate mixing of chyme from altered motility, so varying the nutrient composition of enteral feed may improve absorption in these patients.
PURPOSE: Small intestinal (SI) motor patterns are often disrupted after major non-gastrointestinal (non-GI) surgery, but the impact on luminal flow and nutrient absorption is unclear. This study examines interactions between SI motility, flow and absorption in the first 3 days after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Concurrent assessments of SI motility (manometry), flow (impedancometry) and lipid (¹³C-triolein) and glucose [plasma 3-O-methyl-glucose (3-OMG)] absorption were performed in 13 patients (12 male; 77 ± 2 years) on days 1 and 3 post surgery during 3-h intra-duodenal nutrient infusion (Ensure® with 200 μl ¹³C-triolein, 3 g 3-OMG). Data, presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), are compared with 10 healthy volunteers (9 male; 57 ± 4 years). RESULTS: On day 1 post surgery, there were more motility bursts, fewer impedance events and reduced absorption of ¹³C-triolein [cumulative percent dose recovery (cPDR) 22.9 ± 2.4% versus 31.2 ± 4.2%; P < 0.001] and 3-OMG, compared with health. By day 3, total number of bursts and flow events were similar between groups, with fewer retrograde and more antegrade flow episodes. ¹³C-triolein absorption remained low in patients on day 3 (26.7 ± 2.2%, P < 0.05), correlating positively with total number of flow events (r = 0.49; P < 0.01), but negatively with prolonged events (r = -0.37; P = 0.03). In patients, 3-OMG absorption increased from day 1 to 3 to a level comparable to health. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst disruption in SI motility and flow (impedance) events was associated with reduced absorption of both lipid and carbohydrate, lipidmalabsorption was more prolonged. This may reflect inadequate mixing of chyme from altered motility, so varying the nutrient composition of enteral feed may improve absorption in these patients.
Authors: Marc Jansen; Jürgen Fass; Andreas Tittel; Thorsten Mumme; Michael Anurov; Svetlana Titkova; Michael Polivoda; Alexander Ottinger; Volker Schumpelick Journal: World J Surg Date: 2001-12-21 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Robert J Fraser; Marc Ritz; Addolorata C Di Matteo; Rosalie Vozzo; Monika Kwiatek; Robert Foreman; Brendan Stanley; Jack Walsh; Jim Burnett; Paul Jury; John Dent Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Matthijs P Schwartz; Melvin Samsom; Willem Renooij; Leo W van Steenderen; Marc A Benninga; Erwin-Jan M van Geenen; Margot A van Herwaarden; Martin B M de Smet; André J P M Smout Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nam Q Nguyen; Robert J L Fraser; Marianne Chapman; Laura K Bryant; Judith Wishart; Richard H Holloway; Michael Horowitz Journal: Crit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nam Q Nguyen; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Marianne J Chapman; Judith Wishart; Richard H Holloway; Ross Butler; Michael Horowitz Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 17.440