Literature DB >> 9527302

Trials which randomize practices I: how should they be analysed?

S M Kerry1, J M Bland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In some general practice intervention trials, patients must be randomized in practices rather than individually, and this must be taken into account in the analysis.
OBJECTIVES: In this article we aim to show how failure to do this may lead to spurious statistical significance and CIs which are narrower than they should be, and to describe the use of summary measures for each practice as a simple method of analysis.
METHOD: The statistical issues are demonstrated by an example of a trial in general practice. DISCUSSION: The choice of unit of analysis will be most important where there are large numbers of patients recruited from each practice or a high degree of variability between practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9527302     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.1.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  8 in total

1.  How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S C Lewis; C P Warlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments.

Authors:  David M Murray; Sherri P Varnell; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Addressing the future role of general practice at the 16th Nordic Congress in Copenhagen 2009: how can we ensure sustainable care in a complex world of evidence, context, organization, and personal care?

Authors:  Susanne Reventlow; Henrik Sångren; John Brodersen; Bo Christensen; Anette Grauengaard; Dorte Jarbøl; Marianne Rosendal; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Lack of benefit of a primary care-based nurse-led education programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Christina R Victor; Eric Triggs; Fiona Ross; Joanne Lord; John S Axford
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials.

Authors:  Sandra Eldridge; Deborah Ashby; Catherine Bennett; Melanie Wakelin; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-25

6.  The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Charles Weijer; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles; Andrew D McRae; Angela White; Jamie C Brehaut; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Behavioural and weight status outcomes from an exploratory trial of the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (HeLP): a novel school-based obesity prevention programme.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lloyd; Katrina M Wyatt; Siobhan Creanor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  A systematic review of cluster randomised trials in residential facilities for older people suggests how to improve quality.

Authors:  Karla Diaz-Ordaz; Robert Froud; Bart Sheehan; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.