Literature DB >> 9526829

Effect of the menstrual cycle in ethanol pharmacokinetics.

L Haddad1, P Milke, L Zapata, J R de la Fuente, F Vargas-Vorácková, M Lorenzana-Jiménez, G Corte, J Tamayo, M Kaplan, M Márquez, D Kershenobich.   

Abstract

Differences in ethanol pharmacokinetics within the menstrual cycle have previously been reported and attributed to variations in body composition, hormonal influences and gastric emptying. To establish the role of the menstrual cycle in ethanol pharmacokinetics associated with changes in body composition, ethanol blood concentrations were measured in nine healthy women during the midfollicular (P1, days 8-10) and midluteal (P2, days 22-24) phases of the menstrual cycle after a postprandial oral ethanol dose (0.3 g kg(-1)). Total body water was assessed by dual-energy x-ray densitometry (DEXA) on both occasions. Median total body water did not vary during either phase of the menstrual cycle (P1 = 54.54%, P2 = 54.66%; P = 0.9296). Median area under the ethanol concentration-time curve (AUC) was lower during P1 (215.33 mg.h dl(-1)) than during P2 (231.33 mg.h dl(-1))(P = 0.8253). No significant differences were found on ethanol pharmacokinetics in either phase of the menstrual cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9526829     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1263(199801/02)18:1<15::aid-jat463>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Differences between men and women in side effects of second-generation antipsychotics].

Authors:  W Aichhorn; A B Whitworth; E M Weiss; H Hinterhuber; J Marksteiner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: research and forensic applications.

Authors:  Ake Norberg; A Wayne Jones; Robert G Hahn; Johan L Gabrielsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  [Gender differences in psychopharmacology].

Authors:  V Regitz-Zagrosek; C Schubert; S Krüger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Breast pumping and lactational state exert differential effects on ethanol pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; M Yanina Pepino
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 5.  The clinical significance of variations in ethanol toxicokinetics.

Authors:  Anthony F Pizon; Charles E Becker; Dale Bikin
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2007-06

6.  Estimation of prepractice hydration status of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes.

Authors:  Stella L Volpe; Kristen A Poule; Erica G Bland
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Reliability of Compartmental Body Composition Measures in Weight-Stable Adults Using GE iDXA: Implications for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Aimee L Dordevic; Maxine Bonham; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Alison Evans; Elizabeth Barber; Kaitlin Day; Alastair Kwok; Helen Truby
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.