Literature DB >> 9526206

Posterior cruciate ligament-sparing versus posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing arthroplasty. Functional results using the same prosthesis.

D S Pereira1, F F Jaffe, C Ortiguera.   

Abstract

The functional outcomes of 143 total knee arthroplasties performed by 1 surgeon between 1988 and 1992 were reviewed. Ninety-three procedures were carried out with sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); in 50, the PCL was preserved. All cases were performed using the Kinemax prosthesis (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ). Demographically, there were no differences between the 2 patient groups. Patients were evaluated over a mean follow-up period of 3 years (range, 2-6 years) using the 100-point Hospital for Special Surgery knee scoring system. The data revealed no difference in clinical or early radiographic outcome between PCL-sacrificing and PCL-retaining arthroplasties and support the argument that PCL sacrifice should be considered in cases in which extensive releases and complex ligamentous balancing are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9526206     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90091-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  High early failure rate of the Columbus posterior stabilized high-flexion knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Woon-Hwa Jung; Jae-Heon Jeong; Yong-Chan Ha; Young-Kyun Lee; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Partial resection of the PCL insertion site during tibial preparation in cruciate-retaining TKA.

Authors:  Hans Feyen; Nick Van Opstal; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Fibula head is a useful landmark to predict the location of posterior cruciate ligament footprint prior to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ahmed Jawhar; Sandeep Wasnik; Hanns-Peter Scharf; Henning Roehl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Cruciate Retaining compared with Posterior Stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort.

Authors:  Aiw Mayne; H P Harshavardhan; L R Johnston; W Wang; A Jariwala
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Hur; Hyun Ho Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement.

Authors:  M A Ritter; K E Davis; J B Meding; A Farris
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.