Literature DB >> 9525257

Apoptosis induced by fast neutrons versus 60Co gamma-rays in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

A Vral1, M Cornelissen, H Thierens, H Louagie, J Philippé, K Strijckmans, L De Ridder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of high LET fast neutrons compared with low LET 60Co gamma-rays to induce apoptosis in resting lymphocytes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Apoptosis induction was quantified by light microscopic analysis of irradiated lymphocyte samples from healthy donors after 24 h culture. For the dose-response analyses doses ranging from 0.05 to 5 Gy were applied at 1.5 Gy/min (gamma-rays) or 0.2 Gy/min (fast neutrons). To investigate the role of DNA repair in apoptosis induction a dose of 2 Gy was also given at low dose-rate (0.006 Gy/min).
RESULTS: Dose-response curves obtained with both radiation qualities were characterized by an initial steep increase in the number of apoptotic cells below 1 Gy, with a flattening of the curves at higher doses towards 5 Gy. The calculated relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for fast neutrons were close to unity. When a 2 Gy dose was administered at low rather than high dose-rate no decrease in apoptotic cell yield was observed.
CONCLUSION: The dose-response data confirm the high radiosensitivity of lymphocytes and demonstrate that their response to undergo early interphase cell death by apoptosis is largely independent of LET. The observations that apoptosis induction is independent of LET and dose-rate may suggest that initial DNA damage, as opposed to DNA repair, dominate the induction of apoptosis in resting lymphocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9525257     DOI: 10.1080/095530098142383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  6 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of 213Bi-rituximab versus external gamma irradiation for the treatment of B-CLL patients: relative biological efficacy with respect to apoptosis induction and chromosomal damage.

Authors:  Katia Vandenbulcke; Filip De Vos; Fritz Offner; Jan Philippé; Christos Apostolidis; Roger Molinet; Tuomo K Nikula; Klaus Bacher; Virginie de Gelder; Anne Vral; Christophe Lahorte; Hubert Thierens; Rudi A Dierckx; Guido Slegers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Detrimental and protective bystander effects: a model approach.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R E J Mitchel; J L Redpath; D J Crawford-Brown; W Hofmann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  DNA damage response of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to high-LET neutron irradiation.

Authors:  Monique Engelbrecht; Roya Ndimba; Maryna de Kock; Xanthene Miles; Shankari Nair; Randall Fisher; Peter du Plessis; Julie Bolcaen; Matthys Hendrik Botha; Elbie Zwanepoel; Simon Sioen; Ans Baeyens; Jaime Nieto-Camero; Evan de Kock; Charlot Vandevoorde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Relative biological effectiveness of fast neutrons for apoptosis in mouse hair follicles.

Authors:  Hae-June Lee; Sung-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Relative biological effects of neutron mixed-beam irradiation for boron neutron capture therapy on cell survival and DNA double-strand breaks in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  Kakuji Okumura; Yuko Kinashi; Yoshihisa Kubota; Erika Kitajima; Ryuichi Okayasu; Koji Ono; Sentaro Takahashi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  High-Accuracy Relative Biological Effectiveness Values Following Low-Dose Thermal Neutron Exposures Support Bimodal Quality Factor Response with Neutron Energy.

Authors:  Laura C Paterson; Amy Festarini; Marilyne Stuart; Fawaz Ali; Christie Costello; Chad Boyer; Ronald Rogge; Norma Ybarra; John Kildea; Richard B Richardson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.