Literature DB >> 9519414

History of urinary diversion.

J Pannek1, T Senge.   

Abstract

In 1852, Simon was the first to describe a urinary diversion using intestinal segments. In the late 19th and early 20th century, in the absence of antibiotics, urinary diversion using bowel segments carried a high risk of peritonitis. When Coffey introduced a new method for ureteric implantation in 1911, ureterosigmoidostomy became the most frequently used technique. The ileal conduit, first described by Zaayer in 1911, was established as a standard technique by Bricker in 1950. At the same time, Ferris and Oedel demonstrated a hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in 80% of the patients with ureterosigmoidostomy, and the ileal conduit became the preferred from of urinary diversion. The first attempts to create a continent urinary diversion were undertaken by Tizzoni and Foggi in 1888. Mauclaire, in 1895, used the isolatec rectum as a urinary reservoir. Two findings were essential for the development of modern continent urinary diversion: Kock established the principle of bowel detubularization to create a low-pressure reservoir, and Lapides popularized the use of clean intermittent catheterization. Utilizing these techniques, a variety of continent reservoirs were introduced. The majority of these used either ileal segments, like the Hautmann neobladder, or ileocecal segments, like 'Le Bag'. Sinaiko was the first to use the stomach for the creation of a urinary reservoir in 1956. Continent urinary diversion is the method of choice in a large number of patients today. Experimental work demonstrated that the creation of a new bladder using cultured urothelial and muscle cells with biodegradable polymers as a scaffold is feasible, and future developments may be vastly influenced by these techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519414     DOI: 10.1159/000030195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  8 in total

1.  Hyperammonemic encephalopathy in a patient with ureterosigmoidostomy and acute hepatitis: a specific case of fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  Shunsuke Ohnishi; Takeshi Yoshida; Hiroaki Makiyama; Katsuya Usui; Mayumi Kudo; Takahiko Kobayashi; Shuhei Hige; Masahiro Asaka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Urinary diversion for patients with inoperable obstetric vesicovaginal fistula: the Jos, Nigeria experience.

Authors:  Carolyn V Kirschner; Sunday J Lengmang; Ying Zhou; George A A Chima; Jonathan A Karshima; Steven Arrowsmith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Peter E Clark
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2002-10

4.  Large bifid ureteric calculus in a patient with an ileal conduit.

Authors:  Shanmugasundaram Rajaian; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-09

5.  Santosh PGI pouch: A new innovation in urinary diversion.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Sudheer Kumar Devana; Aditya Prakash Sharma; Shrawan Kumar Singh
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-06-18

Review 6.  Artificial urinary conduit construction using tissue engineering methods.

Authors:  Tomasz Kloskowski; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  Continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Andrew Moon; Nikhil Vasdev; Andrew C Thorpe
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10

Review 8.  Tissue engineering in animal models for urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marije Sloff; Rob de Vries; Paul Geutjes; Joanna IntHout; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wout Feitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.